<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Colorado Independent &#187; off-road vehicles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coloradoindependent.com/tag/off-road-vehicles/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coloradoindependent.com</link>
	<description>News you can&#039;t get anywhere else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden Gems wilderness debate heats up in mountain towns</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/58616/hidden-gems-wilderness-debate-heats-up-in-mountain-towns</link>
		<comments>http://coloradoindependent.com/58616/hidden-gems-wilderness-debate-heats-up-in-mountain-towns#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O. Williams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Center Well]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Front Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hidden Gems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Polis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off-road vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolution of support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vail Town Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White River Forest Alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness proposal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=58616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing gets the hackles up in mountain towns quite as quickly these days as broaching the Hidden Gems wilderness proposal. Just bringing up the concept is enough to turn a cocktail party into a tea party on wheels. Supporters of conserving 342,000 acres of public lands as wilderness regularly clash with off-road enthusiasts who insist the national forest must remain open to mechanized travel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing gets the hackles up in mountain towns quite as quickly these days as broaching the Hidden Gems wilderness proposal. Just bringing up the concept is enough to turn a cocktail party into a tea party on wheels.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_58618" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/58616/hidden-gems-wilderness-debate-heats-up-in-mountain-towns/hidden-gems-flyover" rel="attachment wp-att-58618"><img src="http://coloradoindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/hidden-gems-flyover.jpg" alt="" title="hidden gems flyover" width="300" height="199" class="size-full wp-image-58618" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">An aerial view of some of the proposed Hidden Gems wilderness expansion. EcoFlight photo by Dan Davis, www.trekkerphoto.com</p></div><a href="http://www.whiteriverwild.org/">A coalition of conservationists,</a> fans of lower impact forms of outdoor recreation and high-country residents interested in preserving more of the national forest around them has banded together to advocate for up to 342,000 additional acres of wilderness in Colorado.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whiteriverforestalliance.org/">Off-road vehicle enthusiasts,</a> mountain bikers and supporters of some of the extractive industries on public lands, such as mining, oil and gas and logging interests, have rallied to try to defeat the proposal, which is <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/41607/polis-weighs-into-fray-over-hidden-gems-wilderness-proposal">being weighed by U.S. Rep. Jared Polis, D-Boulder,</a> for possible sponsorship in the next session of Congress.</p>
<p>The<a href="http://www.vailgov.com"> Vail Town Council</a> will jump into the fray Tuesday when it considers approving a resolution of support for Hidden Gems, which could create 14 additional stand-alone wilderness areas and expand 26 others in the White River and Gunnison national forests. Eagle, Summit, Gunnison and Pitkin counties are the most impacted.</p>
<p>“As drafted, Resolution No. 21 states the Town Council’s support for expansions to the existing Eagle’s Nest and Holy Cross Wilderness areas in the vicinity of the town, and in areas in which the town has shown great interest in the past,” Vail officials said in a release Friday, adding the resolution was only drafted after boundary adjustments were made to address wildfire concerns by the Vail Fire Department.</p>
<p>“The resolution also urges Colorado’s congressional delegation to approve the wilderness designation in those areas in as timely a fashion as possible to leave a balanced public lands legacy to future generations and as a showcase of the town’s present stewardship,” the town statement read.</p>
<p>“Balanced public lands legacy” is code in some circles for the Obama administration continuing its takeover of the world, including the right to ride ATVs, snowmobiles and mountain bikes in the national forest. Activities in wilderness areas are restricted to hiking, camping, hunting, fishing, kayaking, rafting, snowshoeing, cross-country skiing and horseback riding. In other words, no motorized vehicles – and no industrial activity.</p>
<p>That suits longtime Vail resident Dave Gorsuch just fine. He put his name on a <a href="http://www.commongroundgems.org/?gclid=CISO27C_l6MCFR5ggwodmAmzmA">new ad campaign by the Pew Environmental Group</a> that’s running on The New York Times website and in other major national publications. </p>
<p>“Born to a mining family, I grew up a ski racer, and now I’m a businessman and rancher,” reads the copy attributed to Gorsuch, who’s owner of the Gorsuch Ltd. retail stores in Vail and Aspen. “If we want to protect our economic future, we must maintain the beauty, clean air, forests and wildlife habitat we have left. I want my grandchildren and their grandchildren to experience these mountains as I have.”</p>
<p>But for members of the <a href="http://www.whiteriverforestalliance.org/">White River Forest Alliance</a>, vehicle access does not equate to environmental destruction.</p>
<p>“Have any of you ever driven to a high country lake to go fishing, taken an ATV up a mountain road, gone snowmobiling in the White River or Gunnison National Forest?” asks the group’s website. “How would you feel if a group of well-organized people with deep pockets legally locked you out of our public lands and took away your access? That is exactly what they are trying to do.”</p>
<p>Polis, who represents the district that includes says he just wants to sort through rhetoric on both sides of the issue.</p>
<p>“Undoubtedly and unfortunately, extreme points of view will enter this discussion, but we must all work together to put passions aside and stick to the facts,” Polis wrote in a letter to constituents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coloradoindependent.com/58616/hidden-gems-wilderness-debate-heats-up-in-mountain-towns/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>294</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Udall, Bennet back San Juan wilderness, but will they support two other plans?</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/41956/udall-bennet-back-san-juan-wilderness-but-will-they-support-two-other-plans</link>
		<comments>http://coloradoindependent.com/41956/udall-bennet-back-san-juan-wilderness-but-will-they-support-two-other-plans#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O. Williams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado's Canyon Country Wilderness Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hidden Gems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Salazar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bennet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mountain biking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off-road vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Juan Mountains Wilderness Act. Mark udall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ski Areas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skiing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=41956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Colorado Sens. Mark Udall and Michael Bennet earlier this week introduced the Senate version of U.S. Rep. John Salazar’s San Juan Mountains Wilderness Act, which would protect more than 60,000 acres of public lands in southwestern Colorado as either wilderness&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colorado Sens. Mark Udall and Michael Bennet earlier this week introduced the Senate version of U.S. Rep. John Salazar’s San Juan Mountains Wilderness Act, which would protect more than 60,000 acres of public lands in southwestern Colorado as either wilderness or a special management area.</p>
<p><span id="more-41956"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_33889" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img src="http://coloradoindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Picture-91-300x187.png" alt="Sens Mark Udall and Michael Bennet" title="udallbennet" width="200" height="120" class="size-medium wp-image-33889" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sens Mark Udall and Michael Bennet</p></div>
<p>The act, if passed by both houses of Congress, would designate 33,383 acres as wilderness – mostly expanding existing wilderness areas – and 21,697 acres as a special management area. It would also take 6,596 acres of the Naturita Canyon area out consideration for mineral exploration or extraction.</p>
<p>Overall, more than 61,000 acres would be protected in the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, San Juan and Gunnison national forests and the San Juan Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Resource Area in San Juan, Ouray and San Miguel counties.</p>
<p><a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/39504/political-battle-shaping-up-over-conflicting-colorado-wilderness-plans">Senate support is seen as critical</a> to the passage of wilderness protection, and the San Juan bill is said to also have <a href="http://www.gjsentinel.com/hp/content/news/stories/2009/11/10/111109_2A_San_Juan_wilderness.html">widespread local support</a>, but before <a href="http://www.coloradowildernessnetwork.org/">proponents of two other wilderness proposals</a> in Colorado – Hidden Gems and Colorado’s Canyon Country Wilderness Area – get too excited, they should consider Udall’s support for recreation access.</p>
<p>Udall <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/24273/udall-revives-bill-that-would-battle-the-beetle-with-bikes-and-bands">last spring introduced a bill</a> that would make possible more activities on public lands leased by ski areas, where the current definition of what can take place under ski-area special use permits is pretty narrow. But <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/4451/udall-accused-of-opening-recreational-pandoraaos-box-at-ski-areas">environmentalists worry</a> that opening the door to more mountain biking, concerts and alpine coasters could lead to the wholesale Disney-fication of public lands.</p>
<p>Off-road enthusiasts and mountain bikers are <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/41607/polis-weighs-into-fray-over-hidden-gems-wilderness-proposal">concerned they would be shut out</a> of public lands, especially in the extremely popular White River National Forest, where Hidden Gems would designate up to 400,000 as wilderness and therefore block wheeled access. Backcountry conservationists argue the White River, home to the state’s most popular ski areas, is being used to death.</p>
<h6>Got a tip? Freelance story pitch? <a href="mailto:tips@coloradoindependent.com">Send us an e-mail</a>. Follow <a href="http://twitter.com/COindependent">The Colorado Independent on Twitter</a>. </h6>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coloradoindependent.com/41956/udall-bennet-back-san-juan-wilderness-but-will-they-support-two-other-plans/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

