<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Colorado Independent &#187; Commanche 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coloradoindependent.com/tag/commanche-3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coloradoindependent.com</link>
	<description>News you can&#039;t get anywhere else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:37:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Xcel Energy lops nearly $44 million off rate-increase request</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/42585/xcel-energy-lops-nearly-44-million-off-rate-increase-request</link>
		<comments>http://coloradoindependent.com/42585/xcel-energy-lops-nearly-44-million-off-rate-increase-request#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O. Williams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Energy Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commanche 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Outreach Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Service Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xcel Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=42585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.xcelenergy.com/Minnesota/Company/Pages/Home.aspx">Xcel Energy</a> Thursday filed for state approval of a settlement with consumer groups in its ongoing rate case before the <a href="http://www.dora.state.co.us/puc/">Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC)</a>, knocking nearly $44 million from its rate-increase request.</p>
<p>In a settlement with <a href="http://www.energyoutreach.org/">Energy</a>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.xcelenergy.com/Minnesota/Company/Pages/Home.aspx">Xcel Energy</a> Thursday filed for state approval of a settlement with consumer groups in its ongoing rate case before the <a href="http://www.dora.state.co.us/puc/">Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC)</a>, knocking nearly $44 million from its rate-increase request.</p>
<p>In a settlement with <a href="http://www.energyoutreach.org/">Energy Outreach Colorado</a> and the <a href="http://www.coloradoenergy.org/">Colorado Energy Consumers</a>, Xcel agreed to only seek an annual electric rate increase of $136 million, mostly to cover more than $1.7 billion the company invested in the new Comanche 3 coal-fired power plant near Pueblo, two new gas-fired power plants at Fort St. Vrain, a smart-grid project in Boulder and other power line and distribution expenses.</p>
<p><span id="more-42585"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Picture-83.png"><img src="http://coloradoindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Picture-83-300x186.png" alt="coal plant" title="coal plant" width="200" height="120" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-42603" /></a></p>
<p>If approved by the PUC at final deliberations set for Dec. 3, the average residential customer will see an increase of $4.66 a month beginning Jan. 1, and small business customers will see an increase of $7.16 a month. Xcel had originally sought <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/41396/xcel-seeks-nearly-180-million-rate-hike-to-cover-coal-fired-comanche-3">a nearly $180 million increase</a>, which would have upped typical residential rates by nearly $5 a month.</p>
<p>This settlement is similar one last summer when Xcel reduced its rate-increase request from nearly $160 million to $112 million, but <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/42162/a-contrast-in-styles-protesting-energy-policies-in-new-york-colorado">critics at the time</a> claimed even that amount was too much given the company’s ill-advised investment in coal, which may spike in price if the Obama administration successfully pushes through climate change legislation.</p>
<p>Xcel, however, defends the state-of-the-art Comanche 3 project, which is set to come on line by the end of the year.</p>
<blockquote><p>“We see this as a significant step to continuing our ability to provide reliable, reasonably priced electric service,” said Tim Taylor, CEO of Public Service Co. of Colorado, an Xcel Energy company. “Comanche 3 is a great investment for customers. Being able to use low-cost coal to provide base-load power is important for our Colorado customers. It also allows us to take the next step and begin retiring some of our older, less efficient coal-fired power plants to continue reducing our carbon dioxide emissions.”
</p></blockquote>
<p>Xcel has also taken heat for trying to <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/41886/xcel-energys-15000-board-dinners-questioned-in-state-rate-hike-hearing">pass on questionable travel and entertainment expenses</a> to ratepayers – a move it quickly backpedaled on when consumer groups brought the charges to the attention of the PUC.</p>
<h6>Got a tip? Freelance story pitch? <a href="mailto:tips@coloradoindependent.com">Send us an e-mail</a>. Follow <a href="http://twitter.com/COindependent">The Colorado Independent on Twitter</a>. </h6>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coloradoindependent.com/42585/xcel-energy-lops-nearly-44-million-off-rate-increase-request/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

