<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labor to blast mailers aimed at Reagan Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coloradoindependent.com/8599/labor-to-blast-mailers-aimed-at-reagan-democrats/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/8599/labor-to-blast-mailers-aimed-at-reagan-democrats</link>
	<description>News you can&#039;t get anywhere else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 21:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tallport</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/8599/labor-to-blast-mailers-aimed-at-reagan-democrats/comment-page-1#comment-35192</link>
		<dc:creator>tallport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoindependent.com/?p=8599#comment-35192</guid>
		<description>The Employee Free Choice Act makes the ballot an option IF the members call for a ballot.  Although most democratic votes are in the open, ie, voice votes or show of hands. Joining a union or another organization  should be based on the clear intention of the member, e.g., signing a form to enroll, so spare us the talking point and tell the truth.  You want the current system so the ballot vote can be used by management as a way to delay the process and break the union.  That is not the intent of a ballot vote it is?  But that is the  reason to are opposed to the Employee Free Choice Act, because you want unions kept in check. Why not just say that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Employee Free Choice Act makes the ballot an option IF the members call for a ballot.  Although most democratic votes are in the open, ie, voice votes or show of hands. Joining a union or another organization  should be based on the clear intention of the member, e.g., signing a form to enroll, so spare us the talking point and tell the truth.  You want the current system so the ballot vote can be used by management as a way to delay the process and break the union.  That is not the intent of a ballot vote it is?  But that is the  reason to are opposed to the Employee Free Choice Act, because you want unions kept in check. Why not just say that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tallport</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/8599/labor-to-blast-mailers-aimed-at-reagan-democrats/comment-page-1#comment-32768</link>
		<dc:creator>tallport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoindependent.com/?p=8599#comment-32768</guid>
		<description>The Employee Free Choice Act makes the ballot an option IF the members call for a ballot.  Although most democratic votes are in the open, ie, voice votes or show of hands. Joining a union or another organization  should be based on the clear intention of the member, e.g., signing a form to enroll, so spare us the talking point and tell the truth.  You want the current system so the ballot vote can be used by management as a way to delay the process and break the union.  That is not the intent of a ballot vote it is?  But that is the  reason to are opposed to the Employee Free Choice Act, because you want unions kept in check. Why not just say that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Employee Free Choice Act makes the ballot an option IF the members call for a ballot.  Although most democratic votes are in the open, ie, voice votes or show of hands. Joining a union or another organization  should be based on the clear intention of the member, e.g., signing a form to enroll, so spare us the talking point and tell the truth.  You want the current system so the ballot vote can be used by management as a way to delay the process and break the union.  That is not the intent of a ballot vote it is?  But that is the  reason to are opposed to the Employee Free Choice Act, because you want unions kept in check. Why not just say that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tallport</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/8599/labor-to-blast-mailers-aimed-at-reagan-democrats/comment-page-1#comment-25022</link>
		<dc:creator>tallport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoindependent.com/?p=8599#comment-25022</guid>
		<description>The Employee Free Choice Act makes the ballot an option IF the members call for a ballot.  Although most democratic votes are in the open, ie, voice votes or show of hands. Joining a union or another organization  should be based on the clear intention of the member, e.g., signing a form to enroll, so spare us the talking point and tell the truth.  You want the current system so the ballot vote can be used by management as a way to delay the process and break the union.  That is not the intent of a ballot vote it is?  But that is the  reason to are opposed to the Employee Free Choice Act, because you want unions kept in check. Why not just say that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Employee Free Choice Act makes the ballot an option IF the members call for a ballot.  Although most democratic votes are in the open, ie, voice votes or show of hands. Joining a union or another organization  should be based on the clear intention of the member, e.g., signing a form to enroll, so spare us the talking point and tell the truth.  You want the current system so the ballot vote can be used by management as a way to delay the process and break the union.  That is not the intent of a ballot vote it is?  But that is the  reason to are opposed to the Employee Free Choice Act, because you want unions kept in check. Why not just say that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tallport</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/8599/labor-to-blast-mailers-aimed-at-reagan-democrats/comment-page-1#comment-17544</link>
		<dc:creator>tallport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoindependent.com/?p=8599#comment-17544</guid>
		<description>The Employee Free Choice Act makes the ballot an option IF the members call for a ballot.  Although most democratic votes are in the open, ie, voice votes or show of hands. Joining a union or another organization  should be based on the clear intention of the member, e.g., signing a form to enroll, so spare us the talking point and tell the truth.  You want the current system so the ballot vote can be used by management as a way to delay the process and break the union.  That is not the intent of a ballot vote it is?  But that is the  reason to are opposed to the Employee Free Choice Act, because you want unions kept in check. Why not just say that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Employee Free Choice Act makes the ballot an option IF the members call for a ballot.  Although most democratic votes are in the open, ie, voice votes or show of hands. Joining a union or another organization  should be based on the clear intention of the member, e.g., signing a form to enroll, so spare us the talking point and tell the truth.  You want the current system so the ballot vote can be used by management as a way to delay the process and break the union.  That is not the intent of a ballot vote it is?  But that is the  reason to are opposed to the Employee Free Choice Act, because you want unions kept in check. Why not just say that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#39;t Give Up the Vote!</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/8599/labor-to-blast-mailers-aimed-at-reagan-democrats/comment-page-1#comment-16786</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#39;t Give Up the Vote!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoindependent.com/?p=8599#comment-16786</guid>
		<description>At least he got to vote.  Think there is any union you would want to vote &quot;no&quot; on at your workplace?  AFL-CIO&#039;s #1 priority - Employee-Free Choice Act - only lets those seeking union certification decide if employees can vote in a secret ballot election or not.   So, if they seek certification based on signed authorization cards, you would never have that chance.  Obama has promised to sign it if elected.  Don&#039;t fall for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least he got to vote.  Think there is any union you would want to vote &#8220;no&#8221; on at your workplace?  AFL-CIO&#39;s #1 priority &#8211; Employee-Free Choice Act &#8211; only lets those seeking union certification decide if employees can vote in a secret ballot election or not.   So, if they seek certification based on signed authorization cards, you would never have that chance.  Obama has promised to sign it if elected.  Don&#39;t fall for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

