Comments on: UPDATED: Rocky publisher responds to funeral liveblog outrage http://coloradoindependent.com/7966/rocky-publisher-responds-to-funeral-liveblog-outrage News you can't get anywhere else Sun, 27 May 2012 22:47:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: chris d. http://coloradoindependent.com/7966/rocky-publisher-responds-to-funeral-liveblog-outrage/comment-page-1#comment-35562 chris d. Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:48:56 +0000 http://www.coloradoindependent.com/?p=7966#comment-35562 i didn't see this liveblog, and really don't have much of an opinion on it, one way or the other. i guess my initial response would be, if the paper had the permission of the family to be there, was justifiably giving the story lots of attention in print, then what's the problem? aren't newspapers supposed to be transforming to the digital revolution? seems to me like critiques of 'blinky, whirly geek tools' are trying to have it both ways. <br><br>however, my biggest problem is w/ the characterization of mr. temple's reply. i found nothing prickly or defensive to it whatsoever. i didn't see this liveblog, and really don't have much of an opinion on it, one way or the other. i guess my initial response would be, if the paper had the permission of the family to be there, was justifiably giving the story lots of attention in print, then what's the problem? aren't newspapers supposed to be transforming to the digital revolution? seems to me like critiques of 'blinky, whirly geek tools' are trying to have it both ways.

however, my biggest problem is w/ the characterization of mr. temple's reply. i found nothing prickly or defensive to it whatsoever.

]]> By: chris d. http://coloradoindependent.com/7966/rocky-publisher-responds-to-funeral-liveblog-outrage/comment-page-1#comment-15925 chris d. Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:48:56 +0000 http://www.coloradoindependent.com/?p=7966#comment-15925 i didn't see this liveblog, and really don't have much of an opinion on it, one way or the other. i guess my initial response would be, if the paper had the permission of the family to be there, was justifiably giving the story lots of attention in print, then what's the problem? aren't newspapers supposed to be transforming to the digital revolution? seems to me like critiques of 'blinky, whirly geek tools' are trying to have it both ways. <br><br>however, my biggest problem is w/ the characterization of mr. temple's reply. i found nothing prickly or defensive to it whatsoever. i didn't see this liveblog, and really don't have much of an opinion on it, one way or the other. i guess my initial response would be, if the paper had the permission of the family to be there, was justifiably giving the story lots of attention in print, then what's the problem? aren't newspapers supposed to be transforming to the digital revolution? seems to me like critiques of 'blinky, whirly geek tools' are trying to have it both ways.

however, my biggest problem is w/ the characterization of mr. temple's reply. i found nothing prickly or defensive to it whatsoever.

]]> By: The Colorado Independent » RMN ‘Tweets’ the funeral of 3-year old boy killed in ice cream shop http://coloradoindependent.com/7966/rocky-publisher-responds-to-funeral-liveblog-outrage/comment-page-1#comment-15922 The Colorado Independent » RMN ‘Tweets’ the funeral of 3-year old boy killed in ice cream shop Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:23:01 +0000 http://www.coloradoindependent.com/?p=7966#comment-15922 [...] addthis_pub = 'coloradoindependent'; By Cara Degette 9/10/08 6:05 PM UPDATE: Rocky Mountain News publisher John Temple responds to funeral liveblog outrage. [...] [...] addthis_pub = ‘coloradoindependent’; By Cara Degette 9/10/08 6:05 PM UPDATE: Rocky Mountain News publisher John Temple responds to funeral liveblog outrage. [...]

]]>