DENVER– Perhaps no issue will underline the divide separating state Democrats and Republicans this legislative session as well as the war to rein in the payday loan industry. That war saw its first real skirmishes Monday at the capitol when roughly 150 payday-loan business owners and employees rallied outside the building in advance of a hearing on a bill that seeks to cap payday interest rates and limit the infamous cycle of personal payday-loan debt the industry depends upon to generate millions in profits.
Payday supporters, including some state lawmakers, railed against the proposed regulation as an infringement on personal liberty and as job-killing government intervention. Supporters of the regulation say the time has come at last to end clearly predatory loan practices that target the state’s vulnerable populations. Republican lawmakers sympathized outside at the rally and inside the committee room with the lenders, who they portrayed as victims of big government. Democratic lawmakers sympathized with the thousands of payday loan borrowers gouged by excessive rates and fees that surpass consumer-protecting limits that apply to the larger lending industry.
Battle lines at the capitol
Sponsored by State Rep. Mark Ferrandino, D-Denver, Sen. Chris Rommer, D-Denver, the bill, HB 1351, would cap payday loan interest at 36 percent. Proponents say that, based on rates charged all across the finance industry, the rate is fair. Payday lenders claim that capping rates at 36 percent would be catastrophic to the industry and put roughly 1,600 Coloradans employed in the industry out of work.
Ferrandino won his battle in the House Judiciary Committee hearing, which passed the bill on a 7 to 4 party-line vote. Voting against the bill were Representatives Bob Gardner, R-Colorado Springs, Steve King, R-Grand Junction, B.J. Nikkel, R-Loveland, and Mark Waller, R-Colorado Springs.
The bill was originally written as a referendum so that it would be submitted to voters to pass, a course of action Ferrandino said would limit pressure on lawmakers to bow to payday lobbyists. But the bill passed out of committee amended to refer it to legislators alone to pass, which will increase pressure under the dome.* Indeed, Ferrandino told the Colorado Independent that the industry has hired new recruits to join the battle against his legislation.
“It is going to be a fight at the capitol,” Ferrandino said. “I do think that the votes are very close. Both sides are going to be working very hard… We have several dedicated lobbyists who are helping us out. And [Payday loan groups] have hired a huge amount of lobbyists– at least 10 if not 20 lobbyists have been hired to lobby against my bill.”
One of the strong voices advocating for the payday industry yesterday was that of Ron Rockvam, president of Money Now and of the Colorado Financial Service Centers Association (COFISCA).
“I have heard your cries. I have heard your stories. And I have heard you concerns for your jobs,” he told the protest crowd. “I will continue to show up every single day to fight for your jobs, to fight for your rights, for everybody in Colorado to have access to this valued credit source.”
Rockvam reminded the crowd that the payday industry had successfully battled back attempts at regulation in the past.
“I want to remind you that we were here two years ago, and we didn’t win every battle, but we won the war and we will win this war.”
Writing the bill this time
Rich Jones, a director at the Bell Policy Center, which worked with Ferrandino and the Colorado Progressive Coalition to craft the referendum, told the Colorado Independent that payday lenders were exempted from usury laws by the Colorado legislature in 2000. Now payday lenders can charge fees that see consumers paying up to $20 for each of the first $300 they borrow. In other words, they pay $60 to get $300. After that, a 7.5 percent interest rate is charged for the $500 that a borrower can take out. The loan is due in 40 days, roughly. Past that period, interest rates with fees can reach 521 percent. The average rate on a payday loan is around 300 percent, which quickly turns a loan for hundreds of dollars into a debt in the thousands of dollars.
“By moving to the fee structure, it allowed payday lenders to charge more than the 36 percent annual percentage rate,” Jones said. Ferrandino’s bill would remove the ability of the lenders to charge fees and cut back on the exorbitant interest rates that characterize the industry and send its customers spiraling into bankruptcy.
“The bill will ask the voters to take away the special exemption [provided by the state] and force payday lenders to play by the same rules as every other lender in the state,” Jones said.
Feeling the pain of payday lenders
Republican Reps. Frank McNulty of Highlands Ranch and Bob Gardner joined the protesters outside and reached out to the lenders, telling them, in effect, that they “felt their pain” as lawmakers attempted to cut into their business.
You provide a necessary service, McNulty told the payday lenders and employees, veering into sentimental compassion.
“You do it well. You do it with your hearts open. For that, I thank you.”
McNulty promised to fight to save the industry, taking it as a given that Ferrandino’s bill would drive the industry out of Colorado altogether.
“We don’t need to put one of the most highly transparent industries in Colorado out of business,” McNulty said. “In my opinion House Bill 1051 represents one of the most fierce intrusions into the private sector and free market.”
Gardner agreed. “We are prepared to fight the battle for you this afternoon, for what I think is a great slogan: ‘My life, my credit, my choice,’” he said to cheers.
Rockvam railed against the nanny-state style lawmakers behind the bill.
“The employees, the customers are here against HB 1051. It is a job-killer and– probably more importantly to the state of Colorado– it is a statement that the legislature feels that they know better than 300,000 Coloradans who every year fall into a financial shortfall.”
Lifting the curtain, dressing as sharks
Ferrandino said legislators must not succumb to the half-truth campaign payday lobbyists are waging. He said lobbyists will be passing out postcards to lawmakers and offering to take them on tours of payday loan shops. He cautioned them to make up their minds on their own.
“It is one thing to say, ‘I’ve been to a payday loan store. The lobbyist took me.’ Well, sure the lobbyist took you. They took you to exactly what they wanted you to see. Everyone there knew exactly what to say,” Ferrandino told the Colorado Independent. “It is another thing to find out the information on your own.”
The payday business, he said, comes not from giving the loans– the actual service they are promoting– but from the cycle of debt the rates and fees create.
“If you look into the data, you find that only a third of the payday lender base is created from the loans themselves… People don’t need short term loans. They need long term loans to help them get over what they are dealing with.
“I think this is an important issue that needs to be brought forward this year, especially in these tough economic times,” Ferrandino said.
Payday lenders are adamant that any further regulation could drive the industry out of state. They maintain that the industry supports more than 1,600 jobs and pays $44 million in wages to the state.
“Proponents of the legislation know full well that interest rate caps are tantamount to a back door ban on the payday advance industry,” said Rockvam in a release. “Millions in tax revenue would virtually disappear if this measure were to pass.”
This is the second try for Ferrandino. The Denver lawmaker tried to pass similar legislation in 2008 that would have capped lending rates at 36 percent, the same limit set by the U.S. Congress and implemented by the U.S. Armed Services on loans given to military service members and their families. That bill failed to pass the Senate.
At the capitol Monday, Colorado Progressive Coalition co-Executive Director Carlos Valverde was part of a small counter demonstration, which included protesters dressed as sharks.
“Unfortunately we can not pay our members to come out,” he told the Colorado Independent, pointing to the thin ranks of his band of protesters. He was confident nonetheless.
“The community supports the bill. If we were to take this to the ballot today, everyone knows that 521 percent is not a fair interest rate to charge anyone.”
–
* Edit note: The original version of this story reported that Ferrandino’s bill would appear as a ballot referendum. The story now reflects the fact that the bill was amended to change that course of action. Lawmakers alone will vote on the bill.









View Comments
Comment posted March 9, 2010 @ 1:54 pm
Well intentioned, but vote-seeking, uninformed legislators have helped to create bailouts for banks to big to fail (that they created by eliminating existing legislation from the last few decades to curb bank expansion into non-core, risky ventures); the newest credit card rules (that are now forcing card issuers to raise rates, lower limits and impose new fees); cut the legs out from bankruptcy protection for individuals a few years ago (backed by the banking industry); and on and on and on.
One of the most powerful lobbies and groups in the world and the U.S. is the banking industry. Your legislators are heavily influenced by them and continue to do their bidding (intended or unintended by them).
Eliminating payday loans is just another way to move that business to the banking industry – not to protect the consumer. Banks need to recoup lost revenue from mortgage, cards and other loans/fees. Overdraft charges are easier and more expensive than a payday loan. The “cycle of debt” argument is bogus. The same cycle can be perpetuated by bouncing checks or paying late fees all the time. Responsibilty to break that lies with the consumer and their spending patterns.
Go talk to some real economists and experts.
Pingback posted March 9, 2010 @ 12:11 pm
[...] do I know? Because they are using the “everyone knows” rhetoric of a demagogue. Read the story and let your blood boil. [...]
Comment posted March 9, 2010 @ 3:46 pm
Who ever wrote this article needs to check their facts. If a person borrows $300 and pays back $320 that does not work out to paying 300%. Yes if calculated as an APR it would work out to be 300% but they do not allow loans to go for an entire year. People who do not know and understand what an APR is should not be allowed to write or talk about it. The FDIC has a report saying that the average overdraft fee would have an APR of 800% to 1200%. This is 3 to 4 times the amount of payday lenders and yet payday lenders are the bad guys for offering a cheaper alternative to bank fees? I don't think so. Leave them alone.
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 1:15 am
Ha? You fools are supporting these crooked usury laws. Wow. America is backward! It seems all the GOP can say is “it is a JOB KILLER.” That is their best talking point and they love it, no matter the topic. Oh well, who cares if almost 2,000 loan sharks are put out of business? Not I, but these two jokers above me do.
A cheaper alternative to bank fees… HHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAH..
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 8:54 am
Io9an
You also must have more money than you know what to do with…Save it for healthcare, thanks to the tea baggers and insurance companies we're all going to need it…
And, you may need to brush up on your math or get a bank account, but you probably never bounced a check…
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 1:32 pm
so let me get this straight. people who dont even know me will decided for me if i can get a payday loan? that doesnt seen fair and american. if they vote yes on this bill my right to go down to get a loan will be gone. that is wrong.
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 2:06 pm
A 36% annual interest rate sounds reasonable. But payday loans are for two-weeks not an entire year, and cannot be offered at the same annual percentage rate as annual credit loans.
At 36 percent APR, the total fee charged on a $100, two-week advance, would be $1.38. Payday advance lenders could not cover the cost of originating the loan, let alone meeting employee payroll and benefits and other fixed business expenses, like rent.
Such a rate cap would virtually eliminate payday lenders, but not the need for short-term credit. Instead it forces consumers to choose between more expensive alternatives, such as fees for bounced checks, overdraft protection, late bill payments, reconnection fees for a utility discontinued for lack of payment or even unregulated off-shore Internet lenders.
I work in the industry, and working adults are best served when given a variety of options and trusted to make financial decisions based on what’s best for them and their families.
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 2:06 pm
A 36% annual interest rate sounds reasonable. But payday loans are for two-weeks not an entire year, and cannot be offered at the same annual percentage rate as annual credit loans.
At 36 percent APR, the total fee charged on a $100, two-week advance, would be $1.38. Payday advance lenders could not cover the cost of originating the loan, let alone meeting employee payroll and benefits and other fixed business expenses, like rent.
Such a rate cap would virtually eliminate payday lenders, but not the need for short-term credit. Instead it forces consumers to choose between more expensive alternatives, such as fees for bounced checks, overdraft protection, late bill payments, reconnection fees for a utility discontinued for lack of payment or even unregulated off-shore Internet lenders.
I work in the industry, and working adults are best served when given a variety of options and trusted to make financial decisions based on what’s best for them and their families.
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 2:07 pm
You guys are idiots AGAIN… nobody is saying you can NOT get a PAYDAY LOAN! They are simply capping the interest these LOAN SHARKS can charge! If some go out of business, oh well!
Talk about voting and going against your best interests! WAAA, WWAAAAA, WAAAAAA…
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 2:09 pm
better find a new line of work then or start lobbying real hard!
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 2:09 pm
Capping the interest rate at 36% will force all the payday lenders to shut down, an effective ban on the industry and its services. Only making a little over $1 for every $100 loaned at a 36% APR, the lenders will be quickly forced to close their doors. All the employees will lost their jobs. And now that legislators have changed the bill and eliminated the plan for state voters to weigh in on this issue, the people who it's actually affecting – low income borrowers (and not to mention the thousands of payday industry employees too) – don't even get a say! Our lawmakers need to realize that all those responsible borrowers will have one less option for credit when they really need it in this already tough economy.
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 3:11 pm
Helloooooooo……PAY BACK THE LOAN in the time the contract says and it's not 300%, IF YOU DON'T, be prepared to pay the price for this company giving you an unsecured loan and taking that risk. Most, if not all, of these customers cannot go to a traditional bank and borrow… period! There will be no alternatives for them if this service goes away. If you oppose this, just ask yourself one question…Would you loan a high credit risk person(stranger) $100 for 2 weeks for $1.38? I sure wouldn't! People have choices, and slowly but surely, many are going away!
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 8:59 pm
lo9an i wont sink to your level and name call but if they vote yes the payday loan company's go out of buisiness WHERE EXACTLY can i go get a payday loan?
Pingback posted March 10, 2010 @ 9:48 pm
[...] the original post: First shots fired in Colorado payday loan war « Colorado Independent Author: admin Time: Tuesday, March 9th, 2010 at 2:24 pm Category: Fast Payday Loans [...]
Pingback posted March 11, 2010 @ 9:13 am
[...] More here: First shots fired in Colorado payday loan war « Colorado Independent [...]
Comment posted March 13, 2010 @ 5:04 pm
36% sure seems adequate to me, the big banks make it quite well on much less than that. These people are loan sharks worthy of Mafia scum. It seems that any way of making $, however immoral is ok these days.
Comment posted March 16, 2010 @ 2:31 pm
The future of payday loans should be determined by the behavior of Borrowers. It's smile supply and demand in a free market economy where consumers have the power of choice! Limiting this choice is not in the public's interest!
The simple facts are as follows:
The average payday loan has a fee of about $15 per $100 borrowed for two weeks. That's $0.15 per $1.00 borrowed.
By contrast, the average bank and credit union overdraft protection “LOAN” (according to the FDIC) has a fee of $27 + per $36 borrowed from three or four days. That's $0.75 per $1.00 borrowed.
In some cases, banks now charge up to $40 per overdraft check and after 4 days, charge an additional $8 per day charge. In this case, the fees on a $100, two-week “overdraft protection LOAN” from a bank or credit union equal $128. That's $1.28 per $1.00 borrowed.
The average cost of offering a payday loan can be $14 or more, meaning that industry isn't nearly as profitable as suggested! Just look at the records of the public companies!
The cycle of debt doesn't truly exist! Consumers are not obligated to borrow the same amount every time, meaning that if they don't have enough money after paying back their loan, they have options including free extended payment plans, or borrowing less in future loans.
It is critical that the community has a voice in public debate, but make sure it is the CUSTOMERS not the “self-proclaimed consumer advocates”, often funded by banks and credit union, who are being heard!
The following is a link to voices of actual payday customers!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6Iy-Z0WPQA
Comment posted March 18, 2010 @ 7:59 pm
How come no one mentions the fact that Payday loan company's are required by law to offer a payment plan. Example: John borrows $100 until his next pay period, which is every thirty (30) days. So John borrows $100 and is charged $17. This makes his total payment $117.00. He comes in on his next pay period(2nd time in) and refinances it (John pays $17). Thirty (30) days later, John comes in (3rd time in), John has to pay the full amount of $117. He can then re-borrow the full amount of $100 if he chooses to. John comes in the (4th) time and has to pay the finance charge of $17. At this point, John has to be offered the Payment Plan, which is mandated by the state of Colorado. The Payment Plan is 6 equal payments per payment period. So lets say Johns Payment Plan was offered on 2-1-10. John then has the choice to go on the payment plan and the loan no longer a cures any interest. This means John has to come in by 2-30-10, the day before he is due, and write an new check date for his next payday. Then on 3-1-10 and pay $19.50. Again on 4-1-10 $19.50, and again on 5-1-10 he pays $19.50. Then on 6-1-10 he pays another $19.50. On 7-1-10 another $19.50. John comes in again to pay his last payment on 8-1-10 of $19.50. John had the opportunity to take six (6) Months to pay back the $117 that he borrowed. He can pay the payment plan off early if he chooses to. During that six months, the payday loan company has made no money on John. Credit card and Banks do not give you this chance.
Comment posted March 23, 2010 @ 3:30 pm
The banks won't loan it so if you eliminate the payday lenders, what is left. The alternatives are family members, friends or much scarier options. eliminate payday lending and you leave many without viable alternatives
Comment posted March 23, 2010 @ 8:30 pm
The banks won't loan it so if you eliminate the payday lenders, what is left. The alternatives are family members, friends or much scarier options. eliminate payday lending and you leave many without viable alternatives
_____
Consumer Loan Software – Kwik-Loan
Comment posted April 16, 2010 @ 7:06 pm
The Democrats do not know what they are doing when it comes to the economy ! They have the unemployment rate at the highest in the history of the United States. And now they want to attack yet another industry. The proof is in the pudding! They are bringing this country to its economic knees, and have no clue its their fault !!! America needs to wake up and stop listening to the propaganda of the liberal press!!
How far do we have to plummet before people realize where the total blame lies?! The Democrats act like they are the champions of the fight for the poor, when in reality they are hurting the poor worse than any one entity in this country !!!
Comment posted April 16, 2010 @ 7:17 pm
Wow !!! lo9an is a complete moron. Your bank charges more for overdraft fees than these so called loan sharks. But you seem like an average liberal, argue on emotion not cold hard facts !! Because on the truth, you loose every-time !!
Comment posted May 25, 2010 @ 4:48 am
Payday loans are a great way to get out of a tight situation.And they are much better than bank loans.
Need cash before payday ?
We're accepting almost 100% of applicants this month for loans under £750. Get some breathing space with a payday loan from PaydayLendersUK today. Same day, No credit check, responsible lending.
http://www.paydaylendersuk.co.uk
Comment posted July 13, 2010 @ 7:34 am
If anyone really took a good look at the service that we supply to our customers, you might view this much differently.
http://www.paydaybank.ca/
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.