Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput posted a defense of the decision by Sacred Heart parish in Boulder to expel the children of a lesbian couple. In the face of mounting bad press criticizing the school for discrimination, Chaput explained simply that Sacred Heart is Catholic and that gay sex and marriage are not condoned by the Church. He said the children and the lesbian moms are loved but not wanted at Sacred Heart. How the children were let into the pre-school program in the first place and the parents allowed to pay for the privilege of having their children integrated and then booted and themselves referred to as an affront to the Church, is a question unanswered in Chaput’s letter.
Chaput, a proudly conservative political prelate, though, didn’t miss the opportunity to insert an attack on the tax code and suggest that Americans should be allowed to send their kids to Catholic schools and receive a tax write off as a result– no matter whether they’re atheist, agnostic, secular humanist, Muslim, Hindu, divorced, unmarried and sexually active, or pretty much anything similarly non-Catholic. Anything, that is, but gay of course.
From Chaput’s column:
The [lesbian] couple was informed by Sacred Heart of Jesus parish school that the older child, whom they were enrolling in kindergarten for next year, would be allowed to attend kindergarten but would not be able to continue into first grade the year after. Their younger child would be welcome to finish preschool, but not continue into kindergarten…
It’s also true that some of our schools exist as a service outreach in largely non-Catholic communities. Many of our schools also accept students of other faiths and no faith, and from single parent and divorced parent families. These students are always welcome so long as their parents support the Catholic mission of the school and do not offer a serious counter-witness to that mission in their actions…
Our schools, however, exist primarily to serve Catholic families with an education shaped by Catholic faith and moral formation. This is common sense. Other religious traditions do the same according to their beliefs, and at a heavy sacrifice. We need to remember that Catholic families pay twice for a Catholic education: through their taxes, they fund public education; then they pay again to send their children to a Catholic school. The idea that Catholic schools should require support for Catholic teaching for admission, and a serious effort from school families to live their Catholic identity faithfully, is reasonable and just. [emphasis added]
We need to remember that Catholics pay a lot of money to be free of the gays! The column begs a question: What exactly constitutes “offering a serious counter-witness to [the Catholic] mission in their actions”?
Gay parents, clearly. But what about parents who are lawmakers who support abortion rights? Chaput has called on priests to deny serving these kind of parents communion. How about parents who are insurance industry professionals who offer policies that support abortion and birth control and stem cell research and euthanasia and doctor assisted suicide? How about the medical people involved in such things?
How about people who listen to and watch an extremely popular Fox News host who calls on American Catholics to leave their faith for its commitment to social justice, because social justice is anti-capitalist socialism. Is supporting and promoting endless Glenn Beck rantings considered a serious counter witness to the mission of the Church?
Beck this week:
I’m begging you, your right to religion and freedom to exercise religion and read all of the passages of the Bible as you want to read them and as your church wants to preach them . . . are going to come under the ropes in the next year. If it lasts that long, it will be the next year. I beg you, look for the words ’social justice’ or ‘economic justice’ on your church Web site. If you find it, run as fast as you can. Social justice and economic justice, they are code words. Now, am I advising people to leave their church? Yes!” Listen here.
Concerned Coloradans demand a follow-up column from Chaput, providing much clearer detail on who among us are welcome to send our children to Catholic school– to send them, that is, and not have them later expelled through no fault of their own. As Chaput says, the devil is in the details.








View Comments
Comment posted March 9, 2010 @ 5:40 pm
It seems to me that this lesbian couple should thank their lucky stars. If they had lied to a Muslim medrassas and then been found out, they would be chasing their heads down McCaslin Blvd. Your statement about Chaput being conservative is confusing. Chaput worked on the Jimmy Carter campaigns in 1976 and 1980. I don not know if he voted for Obama, but he definitely leans Democrat.
Comment posted March 9, 2010 @ 7:05 pm
Disgusting
Again as with DC, Catholics single out the gays but it is OK for someone to divorce or remarry three, four, five times
God will destroy them
Comment posted March 9, 2010 @ 9:11 pm
Chaput leans democrat? Who said anything about the gay couple lying to anyone? 7th dredges up the Muslim card and the usual stereotypical Christian anti Islamic nonsense. It would appear it is Archy Chaput who is chasing his head down McCaslin Blvd.
“Catholics families pay twice for a Catholic education”? I believe the last time I checked Chaput's Catholic families get a tax write off for tuition and charitable contributions to the church.
Who's “moral formation” is he talking about. I'd say he could use a little of his own.
Pingback posted March 9, 2010 @ 7:31 pm
[...] Defending anti-gay school policy, Chaput takes dig at tax code … [...]
Pingback posted March 10, 2010 @ 1:06 am
[...] Defending anti-gay school policy, Chaput takes dig at tax code … [...]
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 8:56 pm
This is really very simple.
Gay people should stay the hell away from Catholic or any other church.
Why is this so difficult?
Judaism and christianity are the most harmful institutions to ever beset the human race and the sooner they are abandoned, the better for humanity.
Comment posted March 11, 2010 @ 4:53 am
Divorce is also, as I understand it, contrary to Catholic teaching. Is Archbishop Chaput going to expel from Catholic schools the children of every parent who has divorced and remarried?
Or the children of every unwed mother?
[crickets chirping]
I didn't think so.
I will believe that Archbishop Chaput is acting in good faith here when he expels the children of every parent whose life shows that they are living contrary to Catholic doctrine.
Comment posted March 13, 2010 @ 10:45 pm
Is the school kicking out all children of mothers who were not virgins when they were married? They should be executing them.
Deuteronomy 22:13-21
13 If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her 14 and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, “I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity,” 15 then the girl's father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate. 16 The girl's father will say to the elders, “I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. 17 Now he has slandered her and said, 'I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.' But here is the proof of my daughter's virginity.” Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, 18 and the elders shall take the man and punish him. 19 They shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver [a] and give them to the girl's father, because this man has given an Israelite virgin a bad name. She shall continue to be his wife; he must not divorce her as long as he lives.
20 If, however, the charge is true and no proof of the girl's virginity can be found, 21 she shall be brought to the door of her father's house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father's house. You must purge the evil from among you.
Comment posted March 14, 2010 @ 4:45 am
Is the school kicking out all children of mothers who were not virgins when they were married? They should be executing them.
Deuteronomy 22:13-21
13 If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her 14 and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, “I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity,” 15 then the girl's father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate. 16 The girl's father will say to the elders, “I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. 17 Now he has slandered her and said, 'I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.' But here is the proof of my daughter's virginity.” Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, 18 and the elders shall take the man and punish him. 19 They shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver [a] and give them to the girl's father, because this man has given an Israelite virgin a bad name. She shall continue to be his wife; he must not divorce her as long as he lives.
20 If, however, the charge is true and no proof of the girl's virginity can be found, 21 she shall be brought to the door of her father's house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father's house. You must purge the evil from among you.
Pingback posted March 16, 2010 @ 12:22 am
[...] on March 16, 2010 Archbishop Charles Chaput of the Denver archdiocese has recently backed a decision by a local school to expel a child because his parents happen to be a lesbian couple. Jimmy Akin, a staunch defender of Catholic moral theology, naturally sides with the bishop on this [...]
Pingback posted March 18, 2010 @ 11:41 pm
[...] Defending anti-gay school policy, Chaput takes dig at tax code … [...]
Comment posted April 3, 2010 @ 5:11 pm
is it the fault of the child having gay parents for as far as I know, the child never had the chance to select her parents. then, why punish the child and traumatize him at an early age? society should look no farther, take the child's feelings first and judge, see the effect on the child being kicked out from school for reasons beyond his control.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.