USA Today’s editorial board has joined a growing cacophony of critics of the way that Denver officials — including Mayor John Hickenlooper — are, as longtime activist Nita Gonzales puts it, merely paying "lip service to civil liberties" when it comes to free speech and the upcoming Democratic National Convention.
In an editorial today, the five-million circulation daily blasts Denver officials for regarding constitutional rights as “nuisances,” and attempting to keep demonstrators out of sight and sound of the convention site — in essence breaking a February promise. From the editorial:
The delegates who’ll wave signs, speak their minds and nominate a presidential candidate at the Democratic National Convention next month in Denver will be treated by the city like royalty. But the people who want to wave signs, speak their minds and demonstrate outside the convention hall have already gotten a taste of Denver’s hospitality. They’re being treated like a bunch of pests …
… A February promise from Mayor John Hickenlooper that at least one designated parade route would end "within sight and sound of the convention site" was essentially abandoned. The route now ends several blocks away, and parades must end one hour before convention sessions begin.
St. Paul, the site of the Republican National Convention, gets a break from the newspaper’s editorial board, as city officials there will allow marchers to walk almost to the convention hall. The catch, of course, is that they must end their parade by midafternoon. Concludes the editorial:
Both cities’ leaders need a remedial course in American values. In 2004, in the face of Boston’s oppressive rules, U.S. District Judge Douglas Woodlock put it well when he wrote that protesters "are not meddling interlopers. … They are participants in our democratic life." It’s tough to participate when you’re behind a fence and blocks away from where you can be seen and heard.






View Comments
Comment posted July 23, 2008 @ 11:47 am
Amazed you haven’t published a direct link to the USAToday.com article and to the original “Comments” by myself and others.
This is the original USA Today.com link to Mayor Hickenloopers rebuttal to
the USAToday Editorial:
(With readers COMMENTS
including regarding current Denver Police efforts to suppress
the free speech rights of our group of protesters two weeks ago )
Denver Mayor Hickenloopers rebuttal:
Opposing view: We support free expression
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/07/opposing-view-2.html#more
As you can see I posted a lengthy comment detailing our Impeach Colorado Coalition’s recent experience in dealing with threats from the Denver police while protesting in front of Rep. DeGette’s office and Channel-7 and Channel-31.
Our experience suggests that the Denver police are currently engaged in a campaign of threats of “disturbing the peace” and “conspiracy” charges against any/all protesters and that this new threat is happening now and is not just “planning for DNC radicals”.
This threat has caused our group to stop using “Honk To Impeach” signs, which the Denver Police claim is a “conspiracy” to violate Denver laws. We do not have the financial resources to oppose them in court and must concentrate on the goal of impeachment, not trying to change local laws. Since there are so few groups pushing for impeachment we feel we must concentrate on our original goal, having impeachment hearings prior to the election.
In an article published on Friday, February 1, 2008 by The Detroit News (Michigan) entitled: Judge Rules In Favor of First Amendment,
Comment posted July 23, 2008 @ 6:47 am
Amazed you haven't published a direct link to the USAToday.com article and to the original “Comments” by myself and others.
This is the original USA Today.com link to Mayor Hickenloopers rebuttal to
the USAToday Editorial:
(With readers COMMENTS
including regarding current Denver Police efforts to suppress
the free speech rights of our group of protesters two weeks ago )
Denver Mayor Hickenloopers rebuttal:
Opposing view: We support free expression
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/07/opposing...
As you can see I posted a lengthy comment detailing our Impeach Colorado Coalition's recent experience in dealing with threats from the Denver police while protesting in front of Rep. DeGette's office and Channel-7 and Channel-31.
Our experience suggests that the Denver police are currently engaged in a campaign of threats of “disturbing the peace” and “conspiracy” charges against any/all protesters and that this new threat is happening now and is not just “planning for DNC radicals”.
This threat has caused our group to stop using “Honk To Impeach” signs, which the Denver Police claim is a “conspiracy” to violate Denver laws. We do not have the financial resources to oppose them in court and must concentrate on the goal of impeachment, not trying to change local laws. Since there are so few groups pushing for impeachment we feel we must concentrate on our original goal, having impeachment hearings prior to the election.
In an article published on Friday, February 1, 2008 by The Detroit News (Michigan) entitled: Judge Rules In Favor of First Amendment,
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.