<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz</link>
	<description>News you can&#039;t get anywhere else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 17:17:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady GaGa was spotted arriving at the gay nightclub Score in Miami &#124; Lady Gaga Celebrity Monitor</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz/comment-page-1#comment-30687</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady GaGa was spotted arriving at the gay nightclub Score in Miami &#124; Lady Gaga Celebrity Monitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=44818#comment-30687</guid>
		<description>[...] Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady GaGa was spotted arriving at the gay nightclub Score in Miami &#124; Lady Gaga Celebrity Monitor</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz/comment-page-1#comment-30688</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady GaGa was spotted arriving at the gay nightclub Score in Miami &#124; Lady Gaga Celebrity Monitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=44818#comment-30688</guid>
		<description>[...] Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperJayne</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz/comment-page-1#comment-34903</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperJayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=44818#comment-34903</guid>
		<description>Bot - Gay people have nothing to do with the women and children who have already gotten the short stick in divorce.  If you want to protect marriage, then legislate to make divorce illegal.  That will truly preserve marriage.  Put more teeth into enforcing men paying child support and / or alimiony who have already divorced. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If gay people get the right to marry tomorrow, it will have zero affect on my parents&#039; marriage or anyone else&#039;s.  My parents will be the only ones who affect their own marriage - they themselves must avoid temptations that destroy marriages:  outside lovers, drugs, gambling, verbal abuse, and physical abuse.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note that there are ZERO items in my list that have anything to do with a neighbor down the street who marries the love of his life, and who happens to also be male.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bot &#8211; Gay people have nothing to do with the women and children who have already gotten the short stick in divorce.  If you want to protect marriage, then legislate to make divorce illegal.  That will truly preserve marriage.  Put more teeth into enforcing men paying child support and / or alimiony who have already divorced. </p>
<p>If gay people get the right to marry tomorrow, it will have zero affect on my parents&#39; marriage or anyone else&#39;s.  My parents will be the only ones who affect their own marriage &#8211; they themselves must avoid temptations that destroy marriages:  outside lovers, drugs, gambling, verbal abuse, and physical abuse.  </p>
<p>Note that there are ZERO items in my list that have anything to do with a neighbor down the street who marries the love of his life, and who happens to also be male.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperJayne</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz/comment-page-1#comment-32794</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperJayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=44818#comment-32794</guid>
		<description>Bot - Gay people have nothing to do with the women and children who have already gotten the short stick in divorce.  If you want to protect marriage, then legislate to make divorce illegal.  That will truly preserve marriage.  Put more teeth into enforcing men paying child support and / or alimiony who have already divorced. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If gay people get the right to marry tomorrow, it will have zero affect on my parents&#039; marriage or anyone else&#039;s.  My parents will be the only ones who affect their own marriage - they themselves must avoid temptations that destroy marriages:  outside lovers, drugs, gambling, verbal abuse, and physical abuse.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note that there are ZERO items in my list that have anything to do with a neighbor down the street who marries the love of his life, and who happens to also be male.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bot &#8211; Gay people have nothing to do with the women and children who have already gotten the short stick in divorce.  If you want to protect marriage, then legislate to make divorce illegal.  That will truly preserve marriage.  Put more teeth into enforcing men paying child support and / or alimiony who have already divorced. </p>
<p>If gay people get the right to marry tomorrow, it will have zero affect on my parents&#39; marriage or anyone else&#39;s.  My parents will be the only ones who affect their own marriage &#8211; they themselves must avoid temptations that destroy marriages:  outside lovers, drugs, gambling, verbal abuse, and physical abuse.  </p>
<p>Note that there are ZERO items in my list that have anything to do with a neighbor down the street who marries the love of his life, and who happens to also be male.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperJayne</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz/comment-page-1#comment-30674</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperJayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=44818#comment-30674</guid>
		<description>Bot - Gay people have nothing to do with the women and children who have already gotten the short stick in divorce.  If you want to protect marriage, then legislate to make divorce illegal.  That will truly preserve marriage.  Put more teeth into enforcing men paying child support and / or alimiony who have already divorced. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If gay people get the right to marry tomorrow, it will have zero affect on my parents&#039; marriage or anyone else&#039;s.  My parents will be the only ones who affect their own marriage - they themselves must avoid temptations that destroy marriages:  outside lovers, drugs, gambling, verbal abuse, and physical abuse.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note that there are ZERO items in my list that have anything to do with a neighbor down the street who marries the love of his life, and who happens to also be male.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bot &#8211; Gay people have nothing to do with the women and children who have already gotten the short stick in divorce.  If you want to protect marriage, then legislate to make divorce illegal.  That will truly preserve marriage.  Put more teeth into enforcing men paying child support and / or alimiony who have already divorced. </p>
<p>If gay people get the right to marry tomorrow, it will have zero affect on my parents&#39; marriage or anyone else&#39;s.  My parents will be the only ones who affect their own marriage &#8211; they themselves must avoid temptations that destroy marriages:  outside lovers, drugs, gambling, verbal abuse, and physical abuse.  </p>
<p>Note that there are ZERO items in my list that have anything to do with a neighbor down the street who marries the love of his life, and who happens to also be male.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kateohanlanmd</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz/comment-page-1#comment-30574</link>
		<dc:creator>kateohanlanmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=44818#comment-30574</guid>
		<description>&quot;How can it be &quot;selfish and myopic&quot; to be concerned about the future of Western Civilization?&quot;&lt;br&gt;Because you think you are smart enough to render a well-reasoned opinion on what is best for the family and for America. Research before you form such an opinion:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The American Anthropological Association confirms that permitting&lt;br&gt;same-sex couples access to the designation of marriage will not deprive opposite-sex couples of any rights and will not alter the legal&lt;br&gt;framework of the institution of marriage inasmuch as same-sex couples who choose to marry will be subject to the same obligations and duties that are currently imposed on married opposite-sex couples. &lt;br&gt;(go to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aaanet.org/press/ma_stmt_marriage.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.aaanet.org/press/ma_stmt_marriage.htm&lt;/a&gt;, accessed&lt;br&gt;January 9, 2009)&lt;br&gt;Tradition is not a valid reason to exclude homosexuals from civil marriage contract any more than it was a valid reason to exclude women from voting or property ownership, when they came&lt;br&gt;about, finally in the 19th century, to claim them. The American&lt;br&gt;Anthropological Association, experts in world culture and tradition,&lt;br&gt;explicitly states that “The results of more than a century of anthropological research on households, kinship relationships, and families, across cultures and through time, provide no support whatsoever for the view that either civilization or viable social orders depend upon marriage as an exclusively heterosexual institution. Rather, anthropological research supports the conclusion that a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane societies..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WANT MORE EXPERT OPINIONS BEFORE YOU WRITE AGAIN???&lt;br&gt;American Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aacap.org/cs/root/policy_statements/sexual_orientation_gender_identity_and_civil_rights&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.aacap.org/cs/root/policy_statements/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;American Psychiatric Association&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.psych.org/edu/other_res/lib_archives/archives/200502.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://archive.psych.org/edu/other_res/lib_arch...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;American Psychological Association&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/policy/marriage.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/policy/marriage.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;American Academy of Pediatrics&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/349&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/118/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;National Association of Social Workers&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.socialworkers.org/diversity/lgb/062804.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.socialworkers.org/diversity/lgb/0628...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;American Anthropological Association&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/Statement-on-Marriage-and-the-Family.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/St...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;American Psychoanalytic Association&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apsa.org/ABOUTAPSAA/POSITIONSTATEMENTS/MARRIAGERESOLUTION/tabid/470/Default.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.apsa.org/ABOUTAPSAA/POSITIONSTATEMEN...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ALL THESE EXPERT ASSOCIATIONS ENDORSE SAME_SEX MARRIAGE, YOUR OPINION IS BASELESS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How can it be &#8220;selfish and myopic&#8221; to be concerned about the future of Western Civilization?&#8221;<br />Because you think you are smart enough to render a well-reasoned opinion on what is best for the family and for America. Research before you form such an opinion:</p>
<p>The American Anthropological Association confirms that permitting<br />same-sex couples access to the designation of marriage will not deprive opposite-sex couples of any rights and will not alter the legal<br />framework of the institution of marriage inasmuch as same-sex couples who choose to marry will be subject to the same obligations and duties that are currently imposed on married opposite-sex couples. <br />(go to <a href="http://www.aaanet.org/press/ma_stmt_marriage.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.aaanet.org/press/ma_stmt_marriage.htm</a>, accessed<br />January 9, 2009)<br />Tradition is not a valid reason to exclude homosexuals from civil marriage contract any more than it was a valid reason to exclude women from voting or property ownership, when they came<br />about, finally in the 19th century, to claim them. The American<br />Anthropological Association, experts in world culture and tradition,<br />explicitly states that “The results of more than a century of anthropological research on households, kinship relationships, and families, across cultures and through time, provide no support whatsoever for the view that either civilization or viable social orders depend upon marriage as an exclusively heterosexual institution. Rather, anthropological research supports the conclusion that a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane societies..</p>
<p>WANT MORE EXPERT OPINIONS BEFORE YOU WRITE AGAIN???<br />American Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists<br /><a href="http://www.aacap.org/cs/root/policy_statements/sexual_orientation_gender_identity_and_civil_rights" rel="nofollow">http://www.aacap.org/cs/root/policy_statements/&#8230;</a></p>
<p>American Psychiatric Association<br /><a href="http://archive.psych.org/edu/other_res/lib_archives/archives/200502.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://archive.psych.org/edu/other_res/lib_arch&#8230;</a></p>
<p>American Psychological Association<br /><a href="http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/policy/marriage.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/policy/marriage.pdf</a></p>
<p>American Academy of Pediatrics<br /><a href="http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/349" rel="nofollow">http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/118/&#8230;</a></p>
<p>National Association of Social Workers<br /><a href="http://www.socialworkers.org/diversity/lgb/062804.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.socialworkers.org/diversity/lgb/0628&#8230;</a></p>
<p>American Anthropological Association<br /><a href="http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/Statement-on-Marriage-and-the-Family.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/St&#8230;</a></p>
<p>American Psychoanalytic Association<br /><a href="http://www.apsa.org/ABOUTAPSAA/POSITIONSTATEMENTS/MARRIAGERESOLUTION/tabid/470/Default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.apsa.org/ABOUTAPSAA/POSITIONSTATEMEN&#8230;</a></p>
<p>ALL THESE EXPERT ASSOCIATIONS ENDORSE SAME_SEX MARRIAGE, YOUR OPINION IS BASELESS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bot</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz/comment-page-1#comment-30572</link>
		<dc:creator>Bot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=44818#comment-30572</guid>
		<description>If feelings are the key requirement, then why not let three people marry, or two adults and a child, or consenting blood relatives of any age? . Marriage-based kinship is essential to stability and continuity in any state. Child abuse is much more prevalent when a living arrangement is not based on kinship.  Kinship imparts family names, heritage, and property, secures the identity and commitment of fathers for the sake of the children, and entails mutual obligations to the community. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; The US Supreme Court declared in 1885 that states&#039; marriage laws must be based on &quot;the idea of the family, as consisting in and springing from the union for life of one man and one woman in the holy estate of matrimony; the sure foundation of all that is stable and noble in our civilization, the best guaranty of that reverent morality which is the source of all beneficent progress in social and political improvement.&#039;&#039; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How can it be &quot;selfish and myopic&quot; to be concerned about the future of Western Civilization?   How can it be &quot;selfish and myopic&quot; to want the best envionment for raising my children and grandchldren (and the children and grandchildren of my fellow citizens)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If feelings are the key requirement, then why not let three people marry, or two adults and a child, or consenting blood relatives of any age? . Marriage-based kinship is essential to stability and continuity in any state. Child abuse is much more prevalent when a living arrangement is not based on kinship.  Kinship imparts family names, heritage, and property, secures the identity and commitment of fathers for the sake of the children, and entails mutual obligations to the community. </p>
<p> The US Supreme Court declared in 1885 that states&#39; marriage laws must be based on &#8220;the idea of the family, as consisting in and springing from the union for life of one man and one woman in the holy estate of matrimony; the sure foundation of all that is stable and noble in our civilization, the best guaranty of that reverent morality which is the source of all beneficent progress in social and political improvement.&#39;&#39; </p>
<p>How can it be &#8220;selfish and myopic&#8221; to be concerned about the future of Western Civilization?   How can it be &#8220;selfish and myopic&#8221; to want the best envionment for raising my children and grandchldren (and the children and grandchildren of my fellow citizens)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kateohanlanmd</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz/comment-page-1#comment-30571</link>
		<dc:creator>kateohanlanmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=44818#comment-30571</guid>
		<description>Bot is selfish and myopic lacks perspective. Heterosexuals have left marriage in shambles, and deserve no special status. All loving couples should receive the same protections, benefits, responsibilities and obligations of civil marriage if our US Constitution means anything at all.&lt;br&gt;Please re-read the Constitution and see that your simpleminded bigotry is only an attempt to hold yourself a little more &quot;special&quot; than you hold others. Get a life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bot is selfish and myopic lacks perspective. Heterosexuals have left marriage in shambles, and deserve no special status. All loving couples should receive the same protections, benefits, responsibilities and obligations of civil marriage if our US Constitution means anything at all.<br />Please re-read the Constitution and see that your simpleminded bigotry is only an attempt to hold yourself a little more &#8220;special&#8221; than you hold others. Get a life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kateohanlanmd</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz/comment-page-1#comment-30558</link>
		<dc:creator>kateohanlanmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=44818#comment-30558</guid>
		<description>Research published in the National Library of Medicine has confirmed that sexual orientation is natural, biologically induced in the first trimester of pregnancy, morally neutral, immutable, neither contagious nor learned and bearing no relation to an individual’s ability to form deep and lasting relationships, to parent children, to work or to contribute to society.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The American Psychological Association states that homosexuality is normal and that homosexual relationships are normal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association have all endorsed civil marriage for same-sex couples because marriage strengthens the mental and physical health and the longevity of couples, and provides greater legal and financial security for children, parents and seniors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When America’s premier child and mental health associations and their expert panels endorse marriage equality, there is no moral or ethical reason to discriminate against gay people and their children, except ignorance or bigotry. Think of what you would want for yourself or your your family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Research published in the National Library of Medicine has confirmed that sexual orientation is natural, biologically induced in the first trimester of pregnancy, morally neutral, immutable, neither contagious nor learned and bearing no relation to an individual’s ability to form deep and lasting relationships, to parent children, to work or to contribute to society.</p>
<p>The American Psychological Association states that homosexuality is normal and that homosexual relationships are normal.</p>
<p>The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association have all endorsed civil marriage for same-sex couples because marriage strengthens the mental and physical health and the longevity of couples, and provides greater legal and financial security for children, parents and seniors.</p>
<p>When America’s premier child and mental health associations and their expert panels endorse marriage equality, there is no moral or ethical reason to discriminate against gay people and their children, except ignorance or bigotry. Think of what you would want for yourself or your your family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz &#8230; &#124; MyGaySpot</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/44818/freshman-year-the-gay-marriage-episode-polis-versus-chaffetz/comment-page-1#comment-30554</link>
		<dc:creator>Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz &#8230; &#124; MyGaySpot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=44818#comment-30554</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post here: Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz &#8230; AKPC_IDS += &quot;4807,&quot;;Popularity: unranked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post here: Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz &#8230; AKPC_IDS += &quot;4807,&quot;;Popularity: unranked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

