Comments on: Palin: Shun science’s ‘politicized agenda’ http://coloradoindependent.com/43843/palin-shun-science%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98politicized-agenda%e2%80%99 News you can't get anywhere else Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:01:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: djaymick http://coloradoindependent.com/43843/palin-shun-science%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98politicized-agenda%e2%80%99/comment-page-1#comment-35700 djaymick Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:42:04 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=43843#comment-35700 What people need to understand is what CO2 makes up in our atmosphere. We're talking about 0.038%. However, CO2 plays a big part of energy. The scientists that are involved in Climategate have a lot to gain. Money for grants and prestige (TV/media announcements, "expert" labels, etc.). When they claim that the "science has been settled", is that the truth. A lot of emails go back to the beginnings of the debate (back in 1999). We voted against Kyoto in the mid-90s under Clinton and they've just pushed their agenda harder, while ruining the lives of people who had questions. All FOIA requests were brushed under the rug. Does this look like transparency? Is this sound science?<br><br>Einstein, when he came up with his theory of relativity, published his work for all skeptics to analyze. He knew that if his work could convince them, it was sound science. Did this happen? Nope.<br><br>Now, the EPA is calling CO2 dangerous for humans. We all exhale CO2 and plants breathe it. Do we need to stop exhaling or is this the beginnings of population control? Well, that will fit with John Holdren's beliefs that are captured in his books. Is it a coincidence that he appears on the emails?<br><br>Nowadays, this is what our media has become. They look for the stories without looking into the details or any investigative followup. Here are a few examples - Honduras (President screams coup, then found to be within their Constitution), IP Gerald Walpin (fired by the President (illegal) and then vindicated), and hanging of census taker Bill Sparkman (blamed on GOP, found to have hung himself).<br><br>Can you provide facts to back up your claims, instead of hearsay? What people need to understand is what CO2 makes up in our atmosphere. We're talking about 0.038%. However, CO2 plays a big part of energy. The scientists that are involved in Climategate have a lot to gain. Money for grants and prestige (TV/media announcements, “expert” labels, etc.). When they claim that the “science has been settled”, is that the truth. A lot of emails go back to the beginnings of the debate (back in 1999). We voted against Kyoto in the mid-90s under Clinton and they've just pushed their agenda harder, while ruining the lives of people who had questions. All FOIA requests were brushed under the rug. Does this look like transparency? Is this sound science?

Einstein, when he came up with his theory of relativity, published his work for all skeptics to analyze. He knew that if his work could convince them, it was sound science. Did this happen? Nope.

Now, the EPA is calling CO2 dangerous for humans. We all exhale CO2 and plants breathe it. Do we need to stop exhaling or is this the beginnings of population control? Well, that will fit with John Holdren's beliefs that are captured in his books. Is it a coincidence that he appears on the emails?

Nowadays, this is what our media has become. They look for the stories without looking into the details or any investigative followup. Here are a few examples – Honduras (President screams coup, then found to be within their Constitution), IP Gerald Walpin (fired by the President (illegal) and then vindicated), and hanging of census taker Bill Sparkman (blamed on GOP, found to have hung himself).

Can you provide facts to back up your claims, instead of hearsay?

]]> By: djaymick http://coloradoindependent.com/43843/palin-shun-science%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98politicized-agenda%e2%80%99/comment-page-1#comment-32894 djaymick Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:42:04 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=43843#comment-32894 What people need to understand is what CO2 makes up in our atmosphere. We're talking about 0.038%. However, CO2 plays a big part of energy. The scientists that are involved in Climategate have a lot to gain. Money for grants and prestige (TV/media announcements, "expert" labels, etc.). When they claim that the "science has been settled", is that the truth. A lot of emails go back to the beginnings of the debate (back in 1999). We voted against Kyoto in the mid-90s under Clinton and they've just pushed their agenda harder, while ruining the lives of people who had questions. All FOIA requests were brushed under the rug. Does this look like transparency? Is this sound science?<br><br>Einstein, when he came up with his theory of relativity, published his work for all skeptics to analyze. He knew that if his work could convince them, it was sound science. Did this happen? Nope.<br><br>Now, the EPA is calling CO2 dangerous for humans. We all exhale CO2 and plants breathe it. Do we need to stop exhaling or is this the beginnings of population control? Well, that will fit with John Holdren's beliefs that are captured in his books. Is it a coincidence that he appears on the emails?<br><br>Nowadays, this is what our media has become. They look for the stories without looking into the details or any investigative followup. Here are a few examples - Honduras (President screams coup, then found to be within their Constitution), IP Gerald Walpin (fired by the President (illegal) and then vindicated), and hanging of census taker Bill Sparkman (blamed on GOP, found to have hung himself).<br><br>Can you provide facts to back up your claims, instead of hearsay? What people need to understand is what CO2 makes up in our atmosphere. We're talking about 0.038%. However, CO2 plays a big part of energy. The scientists that are involved in Climategate have a lot to gain. Money for grants and prestige (TV/media announcements, “expert” labels, etc.). When they claim that the “science has been settled”, is that the truth. A lot of emails go back to the beginnings of the debate (back in 1999). We voted against Kyoto in the mid-90s under Clinton and they've just pushed their agenda harder, while ruining the lives of people who had questions. All FOIA requests were brushed under the rug. Does this look like transparency? Is this sound science?

Einstein, when he came up with his theory of relativity, published his work for all skeptics to analyze. He knew that if his work could convince them, it was sound science. Did this happen? Nope.

Now, the EPA is calling CO2 dangerous for humans. We all exhale CO2 and plants breathe it. Do we need to stop exhaling or is this the beginnings of population control? Well, that will fit with John Holdren's beliefs that are captured in his books. Is it a coincidence that he appears on the emails?

Nowadays, this is what our media has become. They look for the stories without looking into the details or any investigative followup. Here are a few examples – Honduras (President screams coup, then found to be within their Constitution), IP Gerald Walpin (fired by the President (illegal) and then vindicated), and hanging of census taker Bill Sparkman (blamed on GOP, found to have hung himself).

Can you provide facts to back up your claims, instead of hearsay?

]]> By: djaymick http://coloradoindependent.com/43843/palin-shun-science%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98politicized-agenda%e2%80%99/comment-page-1#comment-30206 djaymick Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:42:04 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=43843#comment-30206 What people need to understand is what CO2 makes up in our atmosphere. We're talking about 0.038%. However, CO2 plays a big part of energy. The scientists that are involved in Climategate have a lot to gain. Money for grants and prestige (TV/media announcements, "expert" labels, etc.). When they claim that the "science has been settled", is that the truth. A lot of emails go back to the beginnings of the debate (back in 1999). We voted against Kyoto in the mid-90s under Clinton and they've just pushed their agenda harder, while ruining the lives of people who had questions. All FOIA requests were brushed under the rug. Does this look like transparency? Is this sound science?<br><br>Einstein, when he came up with his theory of relativity, published his work for all skeptics to analyze. He knew that if his work could convince them, it was sound science. Did this happen? Nope.<br><br>Now, the EPA is calling CO2 dangerous for humans. We all exhale CO2 and plants breathe it. Do we need to stop exhaling or is this the beginnings of population control? Well, that will fit with John Holdren's beliefs that are captured in his books. Is it a coincidence that he appears on the emails?<br><br>Nowadays, this is what our media has become. They look for the stories without looking into the details or any investigative followup. Here are a few examples - Honduras (President screams coup, then found to be within their Constitution), IP Gerald Walpin (fired by the President (illegal) and then vindicated), and hanging of census taker Bill Sparkman (blamed on GOP, found to have hung himself).<br><br>Can you provide facts to back up your claims, instead of hearsay? What people need to understand is what CO2 makes up in our atmosphere. We're talking about 0.038%. However, CO2 plays a big part of energy. The scientists that are involved in Climategate have a lot to gain. Money for grants and prestige (TV/media announcements, “expert” labels, etc.). When they claim that the “science has been settled”, is that the truth. A lot of emails go back to the beginnings of the debate (back in 1999). We voted against Kyoto in the mid-90s under Clinton and they've just pushed their agenda harder, while ruining the lives of people who had questions. All FOIA requests were brushed under the rug. Does this look like transparency? Is this sound science?

Einstein, when he came up with his theory of relativity, published his work for all skeptics to analyze. He knew that if his work could convince them, it was sound science. Did this happen? Nope.

Now, the EPA is calling CO2 dangerous for humans. We all exhale CO2 and plants breathe it. Do we need to stop exhaling or is this the beginnings of population control? Well, that will fit with John Holdren's beliefs that are captured in his books. Is it a coincidence that he appears on the emails?

Nowadays, this is what our media has become. They look for the stories without looking into the details or any investigative followup. Here are a few examples – Honduras (President screams coup, then found to be within their Constitution), IP Gerald Walpin (fired by the President (illegal) and then vindicated), and hanging of census taker Bill Sparkman (blamed on GOP, found to have hung himself).

Can you provide facts to back up your claims, instead of hearsay?

]]>