<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Union says goodbye to living wage, property tax proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coloradoindependent.com/4147/union-says-goodbye-to-living-wage-property-tax-proposals/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/4147/union-says-goodbye-to-living-wage-property-tax-proposals</link>
	<description>News you can&#039;t get anywhere else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 16:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenchiledem</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/4147/union-says-goodbye-to-living-wage-property-tax-proposals/comment-page-1#comment-9660</link>
		<dc:creator>greenchiledem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4147#comment-9660</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having trouble with the 20 employees or more health care.  Although we provide hc for our employees, they don&#039;t buy in. They can&#039;t afford it.  The problem isn&#039;t that employers don&#039;t provide hc, it&#039;s the affordabililty. If employers have to pay the costs, well that would cost my small business over $250,000, a conservative estimate.  Does this require employers to pay for the hc?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think this is the answer.  It&#039;s the cost -even group plans are no longer affordable for small biz.  100 employees or less, maybe. But 20, no way.  That&#039;s bound to decrease interest for starting a business.  Or all employers go the Wal Mart route and hire only part timers.  Too bad. This doesn&#039;t sound like it addresses the problem - costs of hc.  If hc was affordable, most employers would offer it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m having trouble with the 20 employees or more health care.  Although we provide hc for our employees, they don&#39;t buy in. They can&#39;t afford it.  The problem isn&#39;t that employers don&#39;t provide hc, it&#39;s the affordabililty. If employers have to pay the costs, well that would cost my small business over $250,000, a conservative estimate.  Does this require employers to pay for the hc?</p>
<p>I don&#39;t think this is the answer.  It&#39;s the cost -even group plans are no longer affordable for small biz.  100 employees or less, maybe. But 20, no way.  That&#39;s bound to decrease interest for starting a business.  Or all employers go the Wal Mart route and hire only part timers.  Too bad. This doesn&#39;t sound like it addresses the problem &#8211; costs of hc.  If hc was affordable, most employers would offer it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenchiledem</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/4147/union-says-goodbye-to-living-wage-property-tax-proposals/comment-page-1#comment-9659</link>
		<dc:creator>greenchiledem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4147#comment-9659</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having trouble with the 20 employees or more health care.  Although we provide hc for our employees, they don&#039;t buy in. They can&#039;t afford it.  The problem isn&#039;t that employers don&#039;t provide hc, its&#039; the affordabililty. If employers have to pay the costs, well that&#039;s would cost my small business over $250,000, a conservative estimate.  Does this require employers to pay for the hc?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think this is the answer.  It&#039;s the affordability -even group plans are no longer affordable for small biz.  100 employees or less, maybe. But 20-no way.  That&#039;s bound to decrease interest for starting a business.  Or all employers go the Wal Mart route and hire only part timers.  Too bad this doesn&#039;t sound like it addresses the problem - cost of hc.  If hc was affordable, most employers would offer it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m having trouble with the 20 employees or more health care.  Although we provide hc for our employees, they don&#39;t buy in. They can&#39;t afford it.  The problem isn&#39;t that employers don&#39;t provide hc, its&#39; the affordabililty. If employers have to pay the costs, well that&#39;s would cost my small business over $250,000, a conservative estimate.  Does this require employers to pay for the hc?</p>
<p>I don&#39;t think this is the answer.  It&#39;s the affordability -even group plans are no longer affordable for small biz.  100 employees or less, maybe. But 20-no way.  That&#39;s bound to decrease interest for starting a business.  Or all employers go the Wal Mart route and hire only part timers.  Too bad this doesn&#39;t sound like it addresses the problem &#8211; cost of hc.  If hc was affordable, most employers would offer it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenchiledem</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/4147/union-says-goodbye-to-living-wage-property-tax-proposals/comment-page-1#comment-7888</link>
		<dc:creator>greenchiledem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4147#comment-7888</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having trouble with the 20 employees or more health care.  Although we provide hc for our employees, they don&#039;t buy in. They can&#039;t afford it.  The problem isn&#039;t that employers don&#039;t provide hc, it&#039;s the affordabililty. If employers have to pay the costs, well that would cost my small business over $250,000, a conservative estimate.  Does this require employers to pay for the hc?

I don&#039;t think this is the answer.  It&#039;s the cost -even group plans are no longer affordable for small biz.  100 employees or less, maybe. But 20, no way.  That&#039;s bound to decrease interest for starting a business.  Or all employers go the Wal Mart route and hire only part timers.  Too bad. This doesn&#039;t sound like it addresses the problem - costs of hc.  If hc was affordable, most employers would offer it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having trouble with the 20 employees or more health care.  Although we provide hc for our employees, they don&#8217;t buy in. They can&#8217;t afford it.  The problem isn&#8217;t that employers don&#8217;t provide hc, it&#8217;s the affordabililty. If employers have to pay the costs, well that would cost my small business over $250,000, a conservative estimate.  Does this require employers to pay for the hc?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this is the answer.  It&#8217;s the cost -even group plans are no longer affordable for small biz.  100 employees or less, maybe. But 20, no way.  That&#8217;s bound to decrease interest for starting a business.  Or all employers go the Wal Mart route and hire only part timers.  Too bad. This doesn&#8217;t sound like it addresses the problem &#8211; costs of hc.  If hc was affordable, most employers would offer it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenchiledem</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/4147/union-says-goodbye-to-living-wage-property-tax-proposals/comment-page-1#comment-7889</link>
		<dc:creator>greenchiledem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4147#comment-7889</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having trouble with the 20 employees or more health care.  Although we provide hc for our employees, they don&#039;t buy in. They can&#039;t afford it.  The problem isn&#039;t that employers don&#039;t provide hc, its&#039; the affordabililty. If employers have to pay the costs, well that&#039;s would cost my small business over $250,000, a conservative estimate.  Does this require employers to pay for the hc?

I don&#039;t think this is the answer.  It&#039;s the affordability -even group plans are no longer affordable for small biz.  100 employees or less, maybe. But 20-no way.  That&#039;s bound to decrease interest for starting a business.  Or all employers go the Wal Mart route and hire only part timers.  Too bad this doesn&#039;t sound like it addresses the problem - cost of hc.  If hc was affordable, most employers would offer it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having trouble with the 20 employees or more health care.  Although we provide hc for our employees, they don&#8217;t buy in. They can&#8217;t afford it.  The problem isn&#8217;t that employers don&#8217;t provide hc, its&#8217; the affordabililty. If employers have to pay the costs, well that&#8217;s would cost my small business over $250,000, a conservative estimate.  Does this require employers to pay for the hc?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this is the answer.  It&#8217;s the affordability -even group plans are no longer affordable for small biz.  100 employees or less, maybe. But 20-no way.  That&#8217;s bound to decrease interest for starting a business.  Or all employers go the Wal Mart route and hire only part timers.  Too bad this doesn&#8217;t sound like it addresses the problem &#8211; cost of hc.  If hc was affordable, most employers would offer it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

