Comments on: Initiative Takes Aim At ‘Right-To-Work’ Amendment, Could Face Problems http://coloradoindependent.com/3644/initiative-takes-aim-at-right-to-work-amendment-could-face-problems News you can't get anywhere else Sun, 27 May 2012 15:13:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: vanzetti http://coloradoindependent.com/3644/initiative-takes-aim-at-right-to-work-amendment-could-face-problems/comment-page-1#comment-9662 vanzetti Thu, 15 May 2008 01:49:17 +0000 http://www.coloradoindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=3644#comment-9662 <strong>Pretty Crafty</strong> Hope it works, since that would be a sweet upper cut to the anti-family forces driving Amendment 47, the 'work for less' amendment.  But it seems a little to late to be trying to drive amendments through the Legislative Council's Title Board.<p><br>Nonetheless, the best way to stop Amendment 47 is to vote against it.  Workers should not be allowed to freeload of the union that is bargaining on their behalf.</p><p><br>And for the record, you cannot force anyone to join a union. It is illegal.  The primary propaganda behind right to work for less laws is that unions are preventing workers who do not want to join the union from getting jobs.  </p><p><br>Guess what, no such situation exists.  There is no real reason to support Amendment 47 except to hurt the long term interests of working families in CO.  Workers in 'right to work for less' states make less money than their counterparts in union shop states (states that allow unions to charge fees to non-union workers if they collectively bargain for them).<br></br></p> Pretty Crafty Hope it works, since that would be a sweet upper cut to the anti-family forces driving Amendment 47, the 'work for less' amendment.  But it seems a little to late to be trying to drive amendments through the Legislative Council's Title Board.

Nonetheless, the best way to stop Amendment 47 is to vote against it.  Workers should not be allowed to freeload of the union that is bargaining on their behalf.

And for the record, you cannot force anyone to join a union. It is illegal.  The primary propaganda behind right to work for less laws is that unions are preventing workers who do not want to join the union from getting jobs. 

Guess what, no such situation exists.  There is no real reason to support Amendment 47 except to hurt the long term interests of working families in CO.  Workers in 'right to work for less' states make less money than their counterparts in union shop states (states that allow unions to charge fees to non-union workers if they collectively bargain for them).

]]> By: vanzetti http://coloradoindependent.com/3644/initiative-takes-aim-at-right-to-work-amendment-could-face-problems/comment-page-1#comment-9663 vanzetti Thu, 15 May 2008 01:49:17 +0000 http://www.coloradoindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=3644#comment-9663 <strong>Pretty Crafty</strong> Hope it works, since that would be a sweet upper cut to the anti-family forces driving Amendment 47, the 'work for less' amendment.  But it seems a little to late to be trying to drive amendments through the Legislative Council's Title Board.<p><br>Nonetheless, the best way to stop Amendment 47 is to vote against it.  Workers should not be allowed to freeload of the union that is bargaining on their behalf.</p><p><br>And for the record, you cannot force anyone to join a union. It is illegal.  The primary propaganda behind right to work for less laws is that unions are preventing workers who do not want to join the union from getting jobs.  </p><p><br>Guess what, no such situation exists.  There is no real reason to support Amendment 47 except to hurt the long term interests of working families in CO.  Workers in 'right to work for less' states make less money than their counterparts in union shop states (states that allow unions to charge fees to non-union workers if they collectively bargain for them).<br></br></p> Pretty Crafty Hope it works, since that would be a sweet upper cut to the anti-family forces driving Amendment 47, the 'work for less' amendment.  But it seems a little to late to be trying to drive amendments through the Legislative Council's Title Board.

Nonetheless, the best way to stop Amendment 47 is to vote against it.  Workers should not be allowed to freeload of the union that is bargaining on their behalf.

And for the record, you cannot force anyone to join a union. It is illegal.  The primary propaganda behind right to work for less laws is that unions are preventing workers who do not want to join the union from getting jobs. 

Guess what, no such situation exists.  There is no real reason to support Amendment 47 except to hurt the long term interests of working families in CO.  Workers in 'right to work for less' states make less money than their counterparts in union shop states (states that allow unions to charge fees to non-union workers if they collectively bargain for them).

]]> By: thegrunt http://coloradoindependent.com/3644/initiative-takes-aim-at-right-to-work-amendment-could-face-problems/comment-page-1#comment-9661 thegrunt Tue, 13 May 2008 20:32:04 +0000 http://www.coloradoindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=3644#comment-9661 <strong>Amendment 47</strong> VOTE YES ON AMENDMENT 47, SHOULDN'T ALL COLORADANS HVE THE RIGHT TO WORK Amendment 47 VOTE YES ON AMENDMENT 47, SHOULDN'T ALL COLORADANS HVE THE RIGHT TO WORK

]]> By: thegrunt http://coloradoindependent.com/3644/initiative-takes-aim-at-right-to-work-amendment-could-face-problems/comment-page-1#comment-7401 thegrunt Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.coloradoindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=3644#comment-7401 <strong>Amendment 47</strong> VOTE YES ON AMENDMENT 47, SHOULDN'T ALL COLORADANS HVE THE RIGHT TO WORK Amendment 47 VOTE YES ON AMENDMENT 47, SHOULDN’T ALL COLORADANS HVE THE RIGHT TO WORK

]]> By: vanzetti http://coloradoindependent.com/3644/initiative-takes-aim-at-right-to-work-amendment-could-face-problems/comment-page-1#comment-7402 vanzetti Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.coloradoindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=3644#comment-7402 <strong>Pretty Crafty</strong> Hope it works, since that would be a sweet upper cut to the anti-family forces driving Amendment 47, the 'work for less' amendment.  But it seems a little to late to be trying to drive amendments through the Legislative Council's Title Board.<p> Nonetheless, the best way to stop Amendment 47 is to vote against it.  Workers should not be allowed to freeload of the union that is bargaining on their behalf.<p> And for the record, you cannot force anyone to join a union. It is illegal.  The primary propaganda behind right to work for less laws is that unions are preventing workers who do not want to join the union from getting jobs.  <p> Guess what, no such situation exists.  There is no real reason to support Amendment 47 except to hurt the long term interests of working families in CO.  Workers in 'right to work for less' states make less money than their counterparts in union shop states (states that allow unions to charge fees to non-union workers if they collectively bargain for them).<br> Pretty Crafty Hope it works, since that would be a sweet upper cut to the anti-family forces driving Amendment 47, the ‘work for less’ amendment.  But it seems a little to late to be trying to drive amendments through the Legislative Council’s Title Board.

Nonetheless, the best way to stop Amendment 47 is to vote against it.  Workers should not be allowed to freeload of the union that is bargaining on their behalf.

And for the record, you cannot force anyone to join a union. It is illegal.  The primary propaganda behind right to work for less laws is that unions are preventing workers who do not want to join the union from getting jobs. 

Guess what, no such situation exists.  There is no real reason to support Amendment 47 except to hurt the long term interests of working families in CO.  Workers in ‘right to work for less’ states make less money than their counterparts in union shop states (states that allow unions to charge fees to non-union workers if they collectively bargain for them).

]]> By: vanzetti http://coloradoindependent.com/3644/initiative-takes-aim-at-right-to-work-amendment-could-face-problems/comment-page-1#comment-7403 vanzetti Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.coloradoindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=3644#comment-7403 <strong>Pretty Crafty</strong> Hope it works, since that would be a sweet upper cut to the anti-family forces driving Amendment 47, the 'work for less' amendment.  But it seems a little to late to be trying to drive amendments through the Legislative Council's Title Board.<p> Nonetheless, the best way to stop Amendment 47 is to vote against it.  Workers should not be allowed to freeload of the union that is bargaining on their behalf.<p> And for the record, you cannot force anyone to join a union. It is illegal.  The primary propaganda behind right to work for less laws is that unions are preventing workers who do not want to join the union from getting jobs.  <p> Guess what, no such situation exists.  There is no real reason to support Amendment 47 except to hurt the long term interests of working families in CO.  Workers in 'right to work for less' states make less money than their counterparts in union shop states (states that allow unions to charge fees to non-union workers if they collectively bargain for them).<br> Pretty Crafty Hope it works, since that would be a sweet upper cut to the anti-family forces driving Amendment 47, the ‘work for less’ amendment.  But it seems a little to late to be trying to drive amendments through the Legislative Council’s Title Board.

Nonetheless, the best way to stop Amendment 47 is to vote against it.  Workers should not be allowed to freeload of the union that is bargaining on their behalf.

And for the record, you cannot force anyone to join a union. It is illegal.  The primary propaganda behind right to work for less laws is that unions are preventing workers who do not want to join the union from getting jobs. 

Guess what, no such situation exists.  There is no real reason to support Amendment 47 except to hurt the long term interests of working families in CO.  Workers in ‘right to work for less’ states make less money than their counterparts in union shop states (states that allow unions to charge fees to non-union workers if they collectively bargain for them).

]]>