Obama Loves His High-speed Rail
Friday, May 02, 2008 at 6:55 pm
If you’re a fan of high-speed rail, which in this country pretty much limits you to the Northeast corridor between New York and Washington, then you’ll want to listen up to the latest from Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama.Traffic gridlock along Interstate 70 in Colorado’s mountains, exacerbated by heavy snow this past winter and spring (including 18 inches Thursday and Friday), has rekindled the concept of mountain mass transit in the form of some kind of high- or even lower-speed train between Denver and Grand Junction.
Drivers tired of a two-hour trips between most major mountain resorts and the Denver metro area turning into six-hour odysseys due to frequent semi-tractor trailer jackknifes and ensuring pass closures (Vail Pass shut down more than 20 times this winter), may find themselves boarding the Obama Express.
According to Time’s “The Page – Politics up to the Minute” blog by Mark Halperin, Barack and Michelle Obama, campaigning ahead of the Indiana primary on Tuesday, visited the suburban Indianapolis home of Mike and Cheryl Fischer in Beech Grove on Friday. Mike Fischer, an Amtrak machinist, is facing a lay-off or possible move to another city to keep his job.
The blog reported Obama enthusiastically launched into the following endorsement of high-speed rail.
“The irony is with the gas prices what they are, we should be expanding rail service. One of the things I have been talking about for awhile is high-speed rail connecting all of these Midwest cities – Indianapolis, Chicago, Milwaukee, Detroit, St. Louis,” Obama said. “They are not that far away from each other. Because of how big of a hassle airlines are now. There are a lot of people if they had the choice, it takes you just about as much time if you had high-speed rail to go the airport, park, take your shoes off.”
The Page reported Obama kept talking up Amtrak:
“This is something that we should be talking about a lot more,” Obama said. “We are going to be having a lot of conversations this summer about gas prices. And it is a perfect time to start talking about why we don’t’ have better rail service. We are the only advanced country in the world that doesn’t have high-speed rail. We just don’t’ have it. And it works on the Northeast corridor. They would rather go from New York to Washington by train than they would by plane. It is a lot more reliable and it is a good way for us to start reducing how much gas we are using. It is a good story to tell.”
Check out the whole blog at Time’s The Page.
Also on the topic of trains, Roberto Moreno, who heads up Denver-based Alpino, an organization dedicated to promoting diversity in snow sports and increasing minority participation, posted this comment on my story on a possible transit solution for the I-70 corridor, which ran on Colorado Confidential and later on realvail.com. His comment on the lack of statewide political will for such a mass transit system was posted at Real Vail.com.
“When Clear Creek County Commissioner Harry Dale argues that ski companies such as Vail Resorts and Intrawest need to be a big part of the rail solution since they have in part contributed to I-70 congestion in the past decade through the sale of discounted season passes in the Front Range market, he is echoing constituent concerns from a growing `forest ambivalent’ electorate which is unwilling to spend the billions of dollars necessary to create a comprehensive mountain corridor solution; one that would include light rail,” Moreno wrote, referring readers to a recent guest column he wrote for the Denver Post
Not sure if Barack is a skier or “forest ambivalent,” but he might like the idea of speeding through Colorado’s mountains on a high-speed Amtrak train.