Comments on: Colorado Supreme Court Affirms “Egg as a Person” Ballot Wording

By: Zappatero

Zappatero — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:40:16 +0000

Colorado for Equal Rights why do I not believe their name?

By: Wendy Norris

Wendy Norris — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:55:46 +0000

sorry about that. link is fixed.

By: bmenezes

bmenezes — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:58:30 +0000

Gotta be 18 to vote still… But the little blastocytes will provide a dandy child tax credit nine months earlier than before…

By: your mom

your mom — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:41:59 +0000

dead link "For more information, read Scrambling the 'Egg-as-Person' Ballot Measure."

That link is dead yo.

By: victorBob

victorBob — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:53:00 +0000

wrong The court did not “affirm” the challenge; it rejected the challenge.

By: oldbogus

oldbogus — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:16:58 +0000

The egg and I I can't believe they didn't include giving them the vote. Of course we couldn't let women vote for them so the father, if known, would get to cast the embryo's vote.

By: Ugly Ernie

Ugly Ernie — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:07:05 +0000

Gender Counting You are absolutely correct that the court's decision was terse. Such a brief order is common when the court unanimously affirms the title board.

Because you noted that the title board is "all male," you might have also noted that the supreme court is not. It has 3 women and 4 men.

By: Ugly Ernie

Ugly Ernie — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Gender Counting You are absolutely correct that the court’s decision was terse. Such a brief order is common when the court unanimously affirms the title board.

Because you noted that the title board is “all male,” you might have also noted that the supreme court is not. It has 3 women and 4 men.

By: oldbogus

oldbogus — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

The egg and I I can’t believe they didn’t include giving them the vote. Of course we couldn’t let women vote for them so the father, if known, would get to cast the embryo’s vote.

By: victorBob

victorBob — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

wrong The court did not “affirm” the challenge; it rejected the challenge.