Comments on: No clones allowed. Religious groups back new NIH stem cell rules http://coloradoindependent.com/26979/no-clones-allowed-religious-groups-back-new-nih-stem-cell-rules News you can't get anywhere else Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:42:10 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: No clones allowed. Religious groups back new NIH stem cell rules http://coloradoindependent.com/26979/no-clones-allowed-religious-groups-back-new-nih-stem-cell-rules/comment-page-1#comment-22888 No clones allowed. Religious groups back new NIH stem cell rules Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:16:00 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=26979#comment-22888 [...] Read More Share and Enjoy: [...] [...] Read More Share and Enjoy: [...]

]]> By: Topics about Aprils-day » No clones allowed. Religious groups back new NIH stem cell rules http://coloradoindependent.com/26979/no-clones-allowed-religious-groups-back-new-nih-stem-cell-rules/comment-page-1#comment-22881 Topics about Aprils-day » No clones allowed. Religious groups back new NIH stem cell rules Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:41:49 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=26979#comment-22881 [...] Planet Sun placed an interesting blog post on No clones allowed. Religious groups back new NIH stem cell rulesHere’s a brief overviewThe Obama Administration issued long-sought guidelines Friday for advancing new federally-funded embryonic stem cell research reversing a nearly nine year ban by the Bush White House. Despite hysterical and inaccurate claims by conservative religious groups over “fetal farming”, the National… [...] [...] Planet Sun placed an interesting blog post on No clones allowed. Religious groups back new NIH stem cell rulesHere’s a brief overviewThe Obama Administration issued long-sought guidelines Friday for advancing new federally-funded embryonic stem cell research reversing a nearly nine year ban by the Bush White House. Despite hysterical and inaccurate claims by conservative religious groups over “fetal farming”, the National… [...]

]]> By: What’s Popular? » Blog Archive » Grants.Gov Strains Under New Demand - Washington Post … http://coloradoindependent.com/26979/no-clones-allowed-religious-groups-back-new-nih-stem-cell-rules/comment-page-1#comment-22880 What’s Popular? » Blog Archive » Grants.Gov Strains Under New Demand - Washington Post … Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:29:46 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=26979#comment-22880 [...] Colorado Independent » No clones allowed. Religious groups back … [...] [...] Colorado Independent » No clones allowed. Religious groups back … [...]

]]> By: Wendy Norris http://coloradoindependent.com/26979/no-clones-allowed-religious-groups-back-new-nih-stem-cell-rules/comment-page-1#comment-33287 Wendy Norris Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:00:49 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=26979#comment-33287 Sorry, Martin1313, I'm not following your reasoning. <br><br>An embryo is <u>not</u> a fetus and is not viable until implanted in a woman's uterus. <br><br>The mother's life is also not in question here. <br><br>The stem cells would be derived from frozen embryos donated with consent of the mother (if it was fertilized with donor sperm) and/or couple for scientific research purposes only. Sorry, Martin1313, I'm not following your reasoning.

An embryo is not a fetus and is not viable until implanted in a woman's uterus.

The mother's life is also not in question here.

The stem cells would be derived from frozen embryos donated with consent of the mother (if it was fertilized with donor sperm) and/or couple for scientific research purposes only.

]]> By: Martin1313 http://coloradoindependent.com/26979/no-clones-allowed-religious-groups-back-new-nih-stem-cell-rules/comment-page-1#comment-33288 Martin1313 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:40:51 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=26979#comment-33288 The fundamental question should be.<br>IF THE MOTHER OR THE FETIS SHOULD LIVE. <br>If there is no agreement on this question, the rest is immaterial.<br>This is the beginning of a conversation. The fundamental question should be.
IF THE MOTHER OR THE FETIS SHOULD LIVE.
If there is no agreement on this question, the rest is immaterial.
This is the beginning of a conversation.

]]> By: No clones allowed. Religious groups back new NIH stem cell rules | Recent Health News http://coloradoindependent.com/26979/no-clones-allowed-religious-groups-back-new-nih-stem-cell-rules/comment-page-1#comment-22875 No clones allowed. Religious groups back new NIH stem cell rules | Recent Health News Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:26:35 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=26979#comment-22875 [...] Read more:  No clones allowed. Religious groups back new NIH stem cell rules [...] [...] Read more:  No clones allowed. Religious groups back new NIH stem cell rules [...]

]]> By: Wendy Norris http://coloradoindependent.com/26979/no-clones-allowed-religious-groups-back-new-nih-stem-cell-rules/comment-page-1#comment-24694 Wendy Norris Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:00:49 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=26979#comment-24694 Sorry, Martin1313, I'm not following your reasoning. <br><br>An embryo is <u>not</u> a fetus and is not viable until implanted in a woman's uterus. <br><br>The mother's life is also not in question here. <br><br>The stem cells would be derived from frozen embryos donated with consent of the mother (if it was fertilized with donor sperm) and/or couple for scientific research purposes only. Sorry, Martin1313, I'm not following your reasoning.

An embryo is not a fetus and is not viable until implanted in a woman's uterus.

The mother's life is also not in question here.

The stem cells would be derived from frozen embryos donated with consent of the mother (if it was fertilized with donor sperm) and/or couple for scientific research purposes only.

]]> By: Martin1313 http://coloradoindependent.com/26979/no-clones-allowed-religious-groups-back-new-nih-stem-cell-rules/comment-page-1#comment-24693 Martin1313 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:40:51 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=26979#comment-24693 The fundamental question should be.<br>IF THE MOTHER OR THE FETIS SHOULD LIVE. <br>If there is no agreement on this question, the rest is immaterial.<br>This is the beginning of a conversation. The fundamental question should be.
IF THE MOTHER OR THE FETIS SHOULD LIVE.
If there is no agreement on this question, the rest is immaterial.
This is the beginning of a conversation.

]]> By: Wendy Norris http://coloradoindependent.com/26979/no-clones-allowed-religious-groups-back-new-nih-stem-cell-rules/comment-page-1#comment-22879 Wendy Norris Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:00:49 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=26979#comment-22879 Sorry, Martin1313, I'm not following your reasoning. <br><br>An embryo is <u>not</u> a fetus and is not viable until implanted in a woman's uterus. <br><br>The mother's life is also not in question here. <br><br>The stem cells would be derived from frozen embryos donated with consent by the mother (if it was fertilized with donor sperm) and/or couple for scientific research purposes only. Sorry, Martin1313, I'm not following your reasoning.

An embryo is not a fetus and is not viable until implanted in a woman's uterus.

The mother's life is also not in question here.

The stem cells would be derived from frozen embryos donated with consent by the mother (if it was fertilized with donor sperm) and/or couple for scientific research purposes only.

]]> By: Martin1313 http://coloradoindependent.com/26979/no-clones-allowed-religious-groups-back-new-nih-stem-cell-rules/comment-page-1#comment-22878 Martin1313 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:40:51 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=26979#comment-22878 The fundamental question should be.<br>IF THE MOTHER OR THE FETIS SHOULD LIVE. <br>If there is no agreement on this question, the rest is immaterial.<br>This is the beginning of a conversation. The fundamental question should be.
IF THE MOTHER OR THE FETIS SHOULD LIVE.
If there is no agreement on this question, the rest is immaterial.
This is the beginning of a conversation.

]]>