<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oil shale water-rights battle brewing over Shell&#8217;s Yampa River claim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coloradoindependent.com/21328/oil-shale-water-rights-battle-brewing-over-shells-yampa-river-claim/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/21328/oil-shale-water-rights-battle-brewing-over-shells-yampa-river-claim</link>
	<description>News you can&#039;t get anywhere else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:19:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: You Can&#8217;t Drink Oil (DailyKos) - LeakBird</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/21328/oil-shale-water-rights-battle-brewing-over-shells-yampa-river-claim/comment-page-1#comment-22419</link>
		<dc:creator>You Can&#8217;t Drink Oil (DailyKos) - LeakBird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=21328#comment-22419</guid>
		<description>[...] the way, in addition to that proposal to divert water from the Yampa to the Front Range, Shell has filed a claim on the river for enough water, 75 cubic feet per second, to build a 45,000-acre-foot  for oil shale [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the way, in addition to that proposal to divert water from the Yampa to the Front Range, Shell has filed a claim on the river for enough water, 75 cubic feet per second, to build a 45,000-acre-foot  for oil shale [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shell official confirms thirsty nature of oil shale, denies push to ‘corner water market’ &#8211; Royal Dutch Shell plc .com</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/21328/oil-shale-water-rights-battle-brewing-over-shells-yampa-river-claim/comment-page-1#comment-22339</link>
		<dc:creator>Shell official confirms thirsty nature of oil shale, denies push to ‘corner water market’ &#8211; Royal Dutch Shell plc .com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=21328#comment-22339</guid>
		<description>[...] ditches in both the Colorado and White River basins. Shell also has filed for a substantialwater right on the Yampa River and has been aggressively buying up land in far western Colorado near Grand [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ditches in both the Colorado and White River basins. Shell also has filed for a substantialwater right on the Yampa River and has been aggressively buying up land in far western Colorado near Grand [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExxonMobil and Shell have “cornered the market” on Western Slope water rights, study says &#8211; Royal Dutch Shell plc .com</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/21328/oil-shale-water-rights-battle-brewing-over-shells-yampa-river-claim/comment-page-1#comment-22281</link>
		<dc:creator>ExxonMobil and Shell have “cornered the market” on Western Slope water rights, study says &#8211; Royal Dutch Shell plc .com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=21328#comment-22281</guid>
		<description>[...] included in the WRA report is the bid by Shell to obtain extensive rights in the Yampa River basin, and other reports have concluded full-scale commercial oil shale [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] included in the WRA report is the bid by Shell to obtain extensive rights in the Yampa River basin, and other reports have concluded full-scale commercial oil shale [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Robinson</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/21328/oil-shale-water-rights-battle-brewing-over-shells-yampa-river-claim/comment-page-1#comment-24486</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=21328#comment-24486</guid>
		<description>This is just the beginning of the water fight. The Department of Energy estimated that oil shale production could require 100 to 300 million of gallons of water a day. And unlike agriculture or residential use, most of that water could not be returned back to the streams because of the contamination. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because Shell and other energy companies own senior water rights, any junior water users are SOL – and since many Northwest ranchers fall into that category, literally thousands of irrigated land could go barren.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let&#039;s not forget the Colorado River Pact of 1922 where the state of Colorado has to guarantee flows to Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, California and Mexico. If oil shale companies make a call on their water rights, Colorado may have to make up the difference by shutting off other sources – like the spigot to the Front Range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just the beginning of the water fight. The Department of Energy estimated that oil shale production could require 100 to 300 million of gallons of water a day. And unlike agriculture or residential use, most of that water could not be returned back to the streams because of the contamination. </p>
<p>Because Shell and other energy companies own senior water rights, any junior water users are SOL – and since many Northwest ranchers fall into that category, literally thousands of irrigated land could go barren.</p>
<p>Let&#39;s not forget the Colorado River Pact of 1922 where the state of Colorado has to guarantee flows to Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, California and Mexico. If oil shale companies make a call on their water rights, Colorado may have to make up the difference by shutting off other sources – like the spigot to the Front Range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Robinson</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/21328/oil-shale-water-rights-battle-brewing-over-shells-yampa-river-claim/comment-page-1#comment-21513</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=21328#comment-21513</guid>
		<description>This is just the beginning of the water fight. The Department of Energy estimated that oil shale production could require 100 to 300 million of gallons of water a day. And unlike agriculture or residential use, most of that water could not be returned back to the streams because of the contamination. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because Shell and other energy companies own senior water rights, any junior water users are SOL – and since many Northwest ranchers fall into that category, literally thousands of irrigated land could go barren.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let&#039;s not forget the Colorado River Pact of 1922 where the state of Colorado has to guarantee flows to Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, California and Mexico. If oil shale companies make a call on their water rights, Colorado may have to make up the difference by shutting off other sources – like the spigot to the Front Range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just the beginning of the water fight. The Department of Energy estimated that oil shale production could require 100 to 300 million of gallons of water a day. And unlike agriculture or residential use, most of that water could not be returned back to the streams because of the contamination. </p>
<p>Because Shell and other energy companies own senior water rights, any junior water users are SOL – and since many Northwest ranchers fall into that category, literally thousands of irrigated land could go barren.</p>
<p>Let&#39;s not forget the Colorado River Pact of 1922 where the state of Colorado has to guarantee flows to Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, California and Mexico. If oil shale companies make a call on their water rights, Colorado may have to make up the difference by shutting off other sources – like the spigot to the Front Range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
