<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aurora City Council takes up same-sex benefits question for city employees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coloradoindependent.com/20107/aurora-city-council-takes-up-same-sex-benefits-question-for-city-employees/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/20107/aurora-city-council-takes-up-same-sex-benefits-question-for-city-employees</link>
	<description>News you can&#039;t get anywhere else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aurora city council domestic partner benefits &#124; CHASD</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/20107/aurora-city-council-takes-up-same-sex-benefits-question-for-city-employees/comment-page-1#comment-68133</link>
		<dc:creator>aurora city council domestic partner benefits &#124; CHASD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 10:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=20107#comment-68133</guid>
		<description>[...] Aurora City Council takes up same-sex benefits question for city &#8230; Jan 26, 2009 &#8230; The Aurora City Council plans to consider Monday night &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aurora City Council takes up same-sex benefits question for city &#8230; Jan 26, 2009 &#8230; The Aurora City Council plans to consider Monday night &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mindydowd</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/20107/aurora-city-council-takes-up-same-sex-benefits-question-for-city-employees/comment-page-1#comment-35020</link>
		<dc:creator>mindydowd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=20107#comment-35020</guid>
		<description>This is wrong and against our state contitution re the definition of marriage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is wrong and against our state contitution re the definition of marriage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mindydowd</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/20107/aurora-city-council-takes-up-same-sex-benefits-question-for-city-employees/comment-page-1#comment-32282</link>
		<dc:creator>mindydowd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=20107#comment-32282</guid>
		<description>This is wrong and against our state contitution re the definition of marriage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is wrong and against our state contitution re the definition of marriage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mindydowd</title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/20107/aurora-city-council-takes-up-same-sex-benefits-question-for-city-employees/comment-page-1#comment-28969</link>
		<dc:creator>mindydowd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=20107#comment-28969</guid>
		<description>This is wrong and against our state contitution re the definition of marriage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is wrong and against our state contitution re the definition of marriage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. T. Davis </title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/20107/aurora-city-council-takes-up-same-sex-benefits-question-for-city-employees/comment-page-1#comment-24853</link>
		<dc:creator>S. T. Davis </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=20107#comment-24853</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think the City of Aurora was progressive in any arena.  I am actually impressed with their effort and foresight on this. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wish them the best of luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t think the City of Aurora was progressive in any arena.  I am actually impressed with their effort and foresight on this. </p>
<p>I wish them the best of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. T. Davis </title>
		<link>http://coloradoindependent.com/20107/aurora-city-council-takes-up-same-sex-benefits-question-for-city-employees/comment-page-1#comment-21164</link>
		<dc:creator>S. T. Davis </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=20107#comment-21164</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think the City of Aurora was progressive in any arena.  I am actually impressed with their effort and foresight on this. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wish them the best of luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t think the City of Aurora was progressive in any arena.  I am actually impressed with their effort and foresight on this. </p>
<p>I wish them the best of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

