Comments on: Buescher’s controversial DNA-swabbing bill likely to bite the dust http://coloradoindependent.com/15964/bueschers-controversial-dna-swabbing-bill-likely-to-bite-the-dust News you can't get anywhere else Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:03:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Wendy Norris http://coloradoindependent.com/15964/bueschers-controversial-dna-swabbing-bill-likely-to-bite-the-dust/comment-page-1#comment-35761 Wendy Norris Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:15:00 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=15964#comment-35761 You've hit the nail on the head. Or the Q-tip in the cheek. <br><br>The rife civil rights violations are likely why no other lawmakers appear to be clamoring to run Buescher's bill in the next session. You've hit the nail on the head. Or the Q-tip in the cheek.

The rife civil rights violations are likely why no other lawmakers appear to be clamoring to run Buescher's bill in the next session.

]]> By: Wildflower http://coloradoindependent.com/15964/bueschers-controversial-dna-swabbing-bill-likely-to-bite-the-dust/comment-page-1#comment-35760 Wildflower Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:53:20 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=15964#comment-35760 It is legal to take DNA swabs of CONVICTED felons.<br>But Buescher's bill would have collection of DNA for ARRESTED felons.<br>There's a big difference between arrested and convicted.<br>The presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a basic right.<br>Buescher's bill might make a DNA "match" a little too easy for an overzealous DA. It is legal to take DNA swabs of CONVICTED felons.
But Buescher's bill would have collection of DNA for ARRESTED felons.
There's a big difference between arrested and convicted.
The presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a basic right.
Buescher's bill might make a DNA “match” a little too easy for an overzealous DA.

]]> By: Wendy Norris http://coloradoindependent.com/15964/bueschers-controversial-dna-swabbing-bill-likely-to-bite-the-dust/comment-page-1#comment-25112 Wendy Norris Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:15:00 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=15964#comment-25112 You've hit the nail on the head. Or the Q-tip in the cheek. <br><br>The rife civil rights violations are likely why no other lawmakers appear to be clamoring to run Buescher's bill in the next session. You've hit the nail on the head. Or the Q-tip in the cheek.

The rife civil rights violations are likely why no other lawmakers appear to be clamoring to run Buescher's bill in the next session.

]]> By: Wildflower http://coloradoindependent.com/15964/bueschers-controversial-dna-swabbing-bill-likely-to-bite-the-dust/comment-page-1#comment-25111 Wildflower Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:53:20 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=15964#comment-25111 It is legal to take DNA swabs of CONVICTED felons.<br>But Buescher's bill would have collection of DNA for ARRESTED felons.<br>There's a big difference between arrested and convicted.<br>The presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a basic right.<br>Buescher's bill might make a DNA "match" a little too easy for an overzealous DA. It is legal to take DNA swabs of CONVICTED felons.
But Buescher's bill would have collection of DNA for ARRESTED felons.
There's a big difference between arrested and convicted.
The presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a basic right.
Buescher's bill might make a DNA “match” a little too easy for an overzealous DA.

]]> By: Wendy Norris http://coloradoindependent.com/15964/bueschers-controversial-dna-swabbing-bill-likely-to-bite-the-dust/comment-page-1#comment-19884 Wendy Norris Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:15:00 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=15964#comment-19884 You've hit the nail on the head. Or the Q-tip in the cheek. <br><br>The rife civil rights violations are likely why no other lawmakers appear to be clamoring to run Buescher's bill in the next session. You've hit the nail on the head. Or the Q-tip in the cheek.

The rife civil rights violations are likely why no other lawmakers appear to be clamoring to run Buescher's bill in the next session.

]]> By: Wildflower http://coloradoindependent.com/15964/bueschers-controversial-dna-swabbing-bill-likely-to-bite-the-dust/comment-page-1#comment-19883 Wildflower Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:53:20 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=15964#comment-19883 It is legal to take DNA swabs of CONVICTED felons.<br>But Buescher's bill would have collection of DNA for ARRESTED felons.<br>There's a big difference between arrested and convicted.<br>The presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a basic right.<br>Buescher's bill might make a DNA "match" a little too easy for an overzealous DA. It is legal to take DNA swabs of CONVICTED felons.
But Buescher's bill would have collection of DNA for ARRESTED felons.
There's a big difference between arrested and convicted.
The presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a basic right.
Buescher's bill might make a DNA “match” a little too easy for an overzealous DA.

]]>