In a speech titled “Little Murders,” Roman Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput of the Archdiocese of Denver delivered a scathing critique of Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, his Catholic running mate Joe Biden and liberal Catholic groups at a dinner Friday.
Raising the false specter of an Obama administration promoting abortion on demand, Chaput said, “To suggest — as some Catholics do — that Senator Obama is this year’s ‘real’ pro-life candidate requires a peculiar kind of self-hypnosis, or moral confusion, or worse.”
AP’s religion reporter Eric Gorski described Chaput as “one of the most politically outspoken Catholic prelates in the nation.” The Denver religious leader did not disappoint on that score during Friday’s remarks at the Educating on the Nature and Dignity of Women dinner.
Chaput, without getting into much detail, called Obama the “most committed” abortion-rights major-party presidential candidate since the landmark Roe v. Wade decision on abortion in 1973.
“To suggest — as some Catholics do — that Senator Obama is this year’s ‘real’ pro-life candidate requires a peculiar kind of self-hypnosis, or moral confusion, or worse,” Chaput said, according to his prepared remarks, titled “Little Murders.”
The archbishop continued with a controversial call to deny communion to Joe Biden, a practicing Catholic, because of his support for reproductive freedom, abortion and contraception. That hard-line perspective has created a schism among lay Catholics who tend to view the church’s “pro-life” teachings much more broadly to include opposition to war and the death penalty and support for the “Catholic worker movement” tenets of eradicating poverty, promoting social justice and personal worship.
Chaput also took the opportunity to criticize liberal Catholic groups as well as Catholic legal scholar Douglas Kmiec, legal counsel to the Reagan administration, who recently endorsed Obama.
According to AP’s report on the dinner speech:
Kmiec wrote a book making a Catholic case for Obama. He argues the Obama campaign is premised on Catholic social teaching like care for working families and the poor and foreign policy premised on peace over war. Democratic efforts to tackle social and economic factors that contribute to abortion hold more promise, Kmiec said, than Republican efforts to criminalize it.
While applauding Kmiec’s past record, Chaput said: “I think his activism for Senator Barack Obama, and the work of Democratic-friendly groups like Catholics United and Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, have done a disservice to the church, confused the natural priorities of Catholic social teaching, undermined the progress pro-lifers have made, and provided an excuse for some Catholics to abandon the abortion issue instead of fighting within their parties and at the ballot box to protect the unborn.”
Pro-Obama Catholics “seek to contextualize, demote and then counterbalance the evil of abortion with other important but less foundational social issues,” said Chaput, who wrote a book this year, “Render Unto Caesar,” about Catholics and politics.
Catholics United fired back with a strongly worded statement arguing that Chaput’s comments, even made as a private citizen, would have a chilling effect on the much-needed dialogue among Catholics on how to address the abortion controversy aside from an outright repeal of Roe v. Wade, which is both politically unlikely and unsupported by the American public:
“During the past eight years we have watched a president rise to power on a ‘pro-life’ platform only to pursue other priorities: perpetrating an unjust war, opposing expanded health care coverage for pregnant women and children, promoting the intrinsic evil of torture, deregulating the financial markets, and mortgaging the future of America’s hard-working families on tax cuts for the rich and powerful. Scant, if any, progress was made toward ending or reducing abortions — quite the contrary, we fear that the looming economic crisis will impel more women to have abortions as people lose their jobs and their homes. This experience serves as poignant reminder of the need for Catholics and other pro-life Americans to look beyond campaign rhetoric and elect candidates who will deliver real results on the issues that matter most.”
Unlike some of his evangelical counterparts promoting Pulpit Freedom Day, Chaput was sure to point out that his remarks were offered as a private citizen and not as a representative of the diocese at the dinner for Catholic women. The Internal Revenue Service has been cracking down on clergy for breaching the law that prohibits tax-exempt religious groups from making statements supporting or opposing political candidates.
Excerpts of Archbishop Chaput’s remarks are posted at Catholic Online.
h/t Rev. John Petty at Progressive Involvement.com






View Comments
Comment posted October 20, 2008 @ 2:32 pm
And speaking of Catholics, I received a robocall today from Bob Beauprez, he of the fox in the henhouse smirk.
He was calling on behalf of Bob Schaffer in re support of Schaffer by Catholics, alluding to 5 tenets of Catholicism, (?) I think he mentioned homosexuality, abortion, stem cell, I don't know what the other two things they hate were, since I am not Catholic.
How very sad and divisive it is when religions interject themselves into politics.
Maybe the churches should pay taxes for awhile instead and they would change their minds about
forcing their religious beliefs on others.
Comment posted October 20, 2008 @ 3:29 pm
** Who cares what any priest says? **
• Pro-life ranters are not pro-life.
They are pro-BIRTH. A dogma once called pro-natalism. It’s an androcentric, completely misogynistic, demand that no impediment whatsoever on births be permitted by law. What happens to mother and child after birth is irrelevant since the “laws” of nature will then cull weak from strong.
No chemical contraception: the pill, spermacides. No barriers to conception: IUD, condoms. No abortions, not even in cases of rape, incest. Pro-natalism is the sexual theory of Ms. Palin, myriad other fundies, Mormons, and the RC church. Enough of ancient paternalistic desert tribal customs which do not belong in any planet-wide ethos.
• Issue one is quality of life, not frequency of birth.
As Marvin Harris made very clear in “Cannibals and Kings”: reproduction will always overtake food production, leading to vast overpopulation, de-facto slavery, degraded environments, and marginal living conditions. Technological intensification of food production makes for only short-term solutions.
But, technological innovation in birth control should already make ancient fears of Doomsday disappear. Why has insane population growth continued, especially in America the wasteful, which added 100 million people in 37 years.
In fact this sick religio-ideology is pro-mass-death: creating disease, poverty, and ignorance worldwide by fostering overpopulation, damning safe non-reproductive sex, and blocking responsible medical research.
• Issue two is social control directed against women and children
Religious authoritarians hate the US. They will not tolerate an open society, a pluralist culture, or a secular state.
Like their muslim brethren, authoritarian xians shudder at a technological world in which mental agility has replaced physical strength as a core measure of economic utility. This reordering of values strips away a core big-3 monotheist lie: god-ordained male supremacy.
Xian ultra-rights, just like Islamic ultra-rights, demand racial “purity,” male dominated social control, subjugation of women, unquestioned acceptance of religious tyranny.
bipolar2 © 2008
Comment posted October 20, 2008 @ 3:44 pm
Dear American Catholics,
What a moral dilemma! If we believe in the 5th commandment, “Thou shall not
kill”, we cannot vote in this election. Both candidates believe in murder.
Obama is pro choice and McCain voted for Bush’s war, one in which we were not attacked,
therefore, a mortal sin; where thousands of Americans soldiers have been martyred
by our diabolic administration for an unworthy cause and where over a hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis have been killed or displaced, mostly civilians.
But, rather than not vote, I suggest you disregard some American Bishops and vote
your conscience.
Otherwise, may we all “requiescant in pace”.
Paul Kos
Comment posted October 20, 2008 @ 5:08 pm
There is no moral dilemma here. If one believe that an individual human being is created at conception as science tells us, then we cannot classify unborn humans as “optional” humans, just like we cannot classify Blacks, Jews, Mentally Disabled, Elderly, and Infants as optional humans. Wake up! We have used abortion to kill 50 million human beings in the name of convenience. Would we vote for a president who supported the “on-demand” killing of some other people group simply because they oppose a specific war or offer a better health plan? Wake up! Senator Obama voted 4 times to allow real babies that were being left to die – and he says the language was wrong – and yet HE VOTED FOR THE LANGUAGE! He doesn't want you to know he will be the most pro-abortion president ever if he takes office – so he lied about the born alive bill that he voted down (see complete documentation here: http://www.bornalivetruth.org/obamarecord.aspx).
Comment posted October 20, 2008 @ 5:08 pm
There is no moral dilemma here. If one believe that an individual human being is created at conception as science tells us, then we cannot classify unborn humans as “optional” humans, just like we cannot classify Blacks, Jews, Mentally Disabled, Elderly, and Infants as optional humans. Wake up! We have used abortion to kill 50 million human beings in the name of convenience. Would we vote for a president who supported the “on-demand” killing of some other people group simply because they oppose a specific war or offer a better health plan? Wake up! Senator Obama voted 4 times to allow real babies that were being left to die – and he says the language was wrong – and yet HE VOTED FOR THE LANGUAGE! He doesn't want you to know he will be the most pro-abortion president ever if he takes office – so he lied about the born alive bill that he voted down (see complete documentation here: http://www.bornalivetruth.org/obamarecord.aspx).
Comment posted October 20, 2008 @ 5:58 pm
If you want to see why Barack Obama shouldn't get a single Catholic vote. see my video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CVBeWt2o5U
Comment posted October 20, 2008 @ 9:32 pm
I don't know the abortion stats pre Roe v Wade, but I imagine there were just as many per population, the only difference is we didn't hear about them because they left desperate women and young girls bleeding to death in back alleys.
If people are really serious about decreasing the number of abortions, they will advocate for poor women and teenage girls to have access to family planning and birth control information and child-rearing information. And they will advocate to help children who are already born.
Comment posted October 21, 2008 @ 7:17 am
I no longer have respect for priests, or anything they say. I think they want to take rights away from women so they can continue to molest little boys. They want a steady stream of orphans so they can have their pick of little boys to sexually molest. If women have control over their bodies, they will make their way out of their houses, where they have been kept pregnant since the beginning of time. Women will want to enter the priesthood, or just hang around and interfere with their child molesting. Catholic priests don't want women to have birth control, or abortion. They want to stay in control of the church, that's why! I hope women will eventually take over the Catholic Church, and end the horrible male domination and female suppression in the church. How can anyone go to a Catholic Church after what has happened? Bad people, evil people, that's who!
Comment posted October 21, 2008 @ 9:50 am
And his church continues to get tax-exempt status? Taxpayers are footing the bill for this intolerant 14th century angry old man?
Comment posted October 21, 2008 @ 2:25 pm
Say, “reverend” chaput, how about cleaning up your own house before you pass judgement on others. Also, how about making some comment about the tens of thousands of people killed by Americans under bush and the millions that have lost their homes. I don't think Jesus would be very proud of your narrow vision of the issues upon which our political leaders should be focused. How about the genocide in Africa, the starving around the world.
Be a real leader with a balanced view. Then, perhaps your “flock” will follow.
Comment posted October 21, 2008 @ 7:10 pm
Shut up Tom, you moron! What about the half million Hussein slaughtered? How many more would there have been?
And Elmerg…he wasn't in his pulpit. And he still has freedom of speech, regardless. The constitution says so, and is held in higher regard than any tax code…you knucklehead!
A few bad priests and all of religion is under fire. You people are challenged. I feel bad for you.
Comment posted October 22, 2008 @ 11:56 am
Only 1.7% of priests are pedophiles. 2-3% of Protestant ministers are pedophiles. No religion or minister should be telling a woman what she can do with her body.
Comment posted November 22, 2008 @ 2:44 pm
The Catholic Church also promotes Natural Family Planning which is a safe and very effective method of birth control. Women are taught to know exactly when they can get pregnant. This is pivotal to the argument against abortion. Woman are so ignorant of their bodies that they don't even know when they can conceive or when the pill is ineffective, as when certain antibiotics are also used. The reason so many are still pro=abortion is because they think women get pregnant unknowingly. We should be looking into ways to make women aware of their reproductive cycles and how they really get pregnant so they have real choice.
Comment posted November 22, 2008 @ 4:44 pm
The Catholic Church also promotes Natural Family Planning which is a safe and very effective method of birth control. Women are taught to know exactly when they can get pregnant. This is pivotal to the argument against abortion. Woman are so ignorant of their bodies that they don't even know when they can conceive or when the pill is ineffective, as when certain antibiotics are also used. The reason so many are still pro=abortion is because they think women get pregnant unknowingly. We should be looking into ways to make women aware of their reproductive cycles and how they really get pregnant so they have real choice.
Comment posted November 22, 2008 @ 10:44 pm
The Catholic Church also promotes Natural Family Planning which is a safe and very effective method of birth control. Women are taught to know exactly when they can get pregnant. This is pivotal to the argument against abortion. Woman are so ignorant of their bodies that they don't even know when they can conceive or when the pill is ineffective, as when certain antibiotics are also used. The reason so many are still pro=abortion is because they think women get pregnant unknowingly. We should be looking into ways to make women aware of their reproductive cycles and how they really get pregnant so they have real choice.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.