Comments on: Udall vows to fight Bush administration fast-tracking of oil-shale leasing http://coloradoindependent.com/11335/udall-vows-to-fight-bush-administration-fast-tracking-of-oil-shale-leasing News you can't get anywhere else Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:57:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Free Glucose Monitors http://coloradoindependent.com/11335/udall-vows-to-fight-bush-administration-fast-tracking-of-oil-shale-leasing/comment-page-1#comment-99263 Free Glucose Monitors Wed, 25 May 2011 10:58:56 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=11335#comment-99263 <strong>Overview of Diabetes...</strong> [...]Diabetes is more common than most people think[...]... Overview of Diabetes…

[...]Diabetes is more common than most people think[...]…

]]> By: Diabetes http://coloradoindependent.com/11335/udall-vows-to-fight-bush-administration-fast-tracking-of-oil-shale-leasing/comment-page-1#comment-85937 Diabetes Wed, 18 May 2011 23:39:16 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=11335#comment-85937 <strong>Diabetes...</strong> [...]a look at the top reasons behind[...]... Diabetes…

[...]a look at the top reasons behind[...]…

]]> By: eBook Library http://coloradoindependent.com/11335/udall-vows-to-fight-bush-administration-fast-tracking-of-oil-shale-leasing/comment-page-1#comment-69144 eBook Library Tue, 10 May 2011 02:10:48 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=11335#comment-69144 <strong>iPhone eBook Reader...</strong> [...]your Apple iPhone can also display eBooks in various formats[...]... iPhone eBook Reader…

[...]your Apple iPhone can also display eBooks in various formats[...]…

]]> By: Wildcatter Weekly, October 16, 2008 | Official web site of IPAMS: Independent Association of Mountain States http://coloradoindependent.com/11335/udall-vows-to-fight-bush-administration-fast-tracking-of-oil-shale-leasing/comment-page-1#comment-26764 Wildcatter Weekly, October 16, 2008 | Official web site of IPAMS: Independent Association of Mountain States Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:48:20 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=11335#comment-26764 [...] More [...] [...] More [...]

]]> By: Ibrew http://coloradoindependent.com/11335/udall-vows-to-fight-bush-administration-fast-tracking-of-oil-shale-leasing/comment-page-1#comment-34213 Ibrew Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:34:07 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=11335#comment-34213 Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The "facts" you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.<br><br> After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic. For a standard voter as me it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast. Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The “facts” you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.

After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic. For a standard voter as me it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast.

]]> By: Ibrew http://coloradoindependent.com/11335/udall-vows-to-fight-bush-administration-fast-tracking-of-oil-shale-leasing/comment-page-1#comment-34214 Ibrew Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:28:06 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=11335#comment-34214 Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The "facts" you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.<br><br> After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic. <br><br>For a standard voter as myself it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast. Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The “facts” you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.

After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic.

For a standard voter as myself it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast.

]]> By: Ibrew http://coloradoindependent.com/11335/udall-vows-to-fight-bush-administration-fast-tracking-of-oil-shale-leasing/comment-page-1#comment-32804 Ibrew Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:34:07 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=11335#comment-32804 Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The "facts" you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.<br><br> After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic. For a standard voter as me it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast. Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The “facts” you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.

After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic. For a standard voter as me it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast.

]]> By: Ibrew http://coloradoindependent.com/11335/udall-vows-to-fight-bush-administration-fast-tracking-of-oil-shale-leasing/comment-page-1#comment-32805 Ibrew Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:28:06 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=11335#comment-32805 Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The "facts" you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.<br><br> After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic. <br><br>For a standard voter as myself it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast. Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The “facts” you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.

After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic.

For a standard voter as myself it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast.

]]> By: Ibrew http://coloradoindependent.com/11335/udall-vows-to-fight-bush-administration-fast-tracking-of-oil-shale-leasing/comment-page-1#comment-25048 Ibrew Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:34:07 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=11335#comment-25048 Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The "facts" you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.<br><br> After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic. For a standard voter as me it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast. Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The “facts” you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.

After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic. For a standard voter as me it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast.

]]> By: Ibrew http://coloradoindependent.com/11335/udall-vows-to-fight-bush-administration-fast-tracking-of-oil-shale-leasing/comment-page-1#comment-25047 Ibrew Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:28:06 +0000 http://coloradoindependent.com/?p=11335#comment-25047 Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The "facts" you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.<br><br> After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic. <br><br>For a standard voter as myself it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast. Not really sure the point you are making, besides that you really do not like Udall and that you are insulting the great people of Colorado. The “facts” you propose are misleading, but I suppose you can get your facts anywhere you like. You should take a lesson from Jeremy as his post is actually useful in thoughtful discussion of this topic, and not full of emotion and hate as yours is.

After doing research on both sides of this issue there are too many conflicting views to make this issue cut and dry, IMHO. The technologies that promise to unlock oil shale from all accounts remain somewhat experimental; it can be done, but it seems very inefficient at this time. I would rather error on the side of caution and wait until the technology is ready. Not only from an economical but from an environmental standpoint as well. My opinion is that we need to focus on off shore production and standard drilling which will bring the product to market faster and cheaper all the while looking at feasible and efficient alternates, including oil shale. I profess that I am no expert on oil and gas, and actually found this site while doing research on this topic.

For a standard voter as myself it is what side of the story to believe most in. And like all things politics when big companies get involved, and lots of money and jobs are at stake, the issues can get muddy very fast.

]]>